지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.3
- 수록면
- 55 - 76 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.24285/CLER.2023.3.39.55
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to classify the discourse response function of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’ and to examine the lexicalization process and mechanism until it is used as a response marker. In this study, analysis was conducted using dramas to examine both the preceding and following utterances of the response.
This study examined the discourse function of ‘可不是(kebushi)’ by dividing it into positive and negative responses. A positive response has the functions of consent, confirmation, and feedback, and a negative response has the function of courtesy. First, ‘consent’ is the most important function of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’. In the preceding utterance, the speaker’s subjective opinion is presented, and the respondent expresses complete agreement for the speaker’s opinion with ‘可不是(kebushi)’. Second, the preceding utterance can ask the other person a question as a modal of question or counter-question, and ask for ‘confirmation’ as to whether or not it is true. At this time, ‘可不是(kebushi)’ is the response to give the confirmation of the fact. Third, listeners can chime in with the preceding utterance and respond to the information conveyed by the speaker by using ‘可不是(kebushi)’ as ‘feedback’. The feedback of the listener at this time is a signal that he/she has accepted and understood the objective fact conveyed by the speaker.
Lexicalization is when two or more words are combined to be likely to form like a single vocabulary. This study examined the process of diachronic change until ‘可(ke)’ and ‘不是(bushi)’ merged into one and became a response marker. The form of ‘可(ke)+不是(bushi)’ the very first appeared in interrogative sentences in the Tang Dynasty(唐代). In the Yuan Dynasty(元代), the use of ‘可不是(kebushi)’ in rhetorical questions increased greatly. A rhetorical question expresses a positive meaning in the form of a negative. A counter-question modal, ‘可不是 (kebushi); how can it not be ···?’ has the implication of ‘of course it is ···’. In the Qing Dynasty(淸代), ‘可不是(kebushi)’ began to be used alone as a response marker for consent. Next, this study also examined the syntactic reanalysis of ‘可不是(kebushi)’. Reanalysis refers to structural changes that do not change the form of the surface layer. Reanalysis is a condition in which the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’ can be lexicalized. ‘可不是(kebushi)’ has a four-step reanalysis process such as (1) 可(ke)+[[不是(bushi)]+X] → (2) [[可不是(kebushi)]+X] → (3) [可不是(kebushi)] → (4) [可不(是)kebu(shi)].
This study considered the mechanisms for the formation of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’ as ‘pragmatic inference’ and ‘contextinduced absorption’. Above all, from the counter-question modal, ‘可不是(kebushi)’, ‘how can it not be ···?’ is inferred the implication of affirmation, ‘of course it is ···’. The subjective feeling of affirmation about an event is very naturally inferred once again as the implicative meaning of ‘consent’. In addition, ‘可不是(kebushi)’ absorbs the context of the rhetorical question and connects with a positive meaning.
It is hoped that the analysis of this study will be helpful in understanding the discourse function and lexicalization process of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’.
This study examined the discourse function of ‘可不是(kebushi)’ by dividing it into positive and negative responses. A positive response has the functions of consent, confirmation, and feedback, and a negative response has the function of courtesy. First, ‘consent’ is the most important function of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’. In the preceding utterance, the speaker’s subjective opinion is presented, and the respondent expresses complete agreement for the speaker’s opinion with ‘可不是(kebushi)’. Second, the preceding utterance can ask the other person a question as a modal of question or counter-question, and ask for ‘confirmation’ as to whether or not it is true. At this time, ‘可不是(kebushi)’ is the response to give the confirmation of the fact. Third, listeners can chime in with the preceding utterance and respond to the information conveyed by the speaker by using ‘可不是(kebushi)’ as ‘feedback’. The feedback of the listener at this time is a signal that he/she has accepted and understood the objective fact conveyed by the speaker.
Lexicalization is when two or more words are combined to be likely to form like a single vocabulary. This study examined the process of diachronic change until ‘可(ke)’ and ‘不是(bushi)’ merged into one and became a response marker. The form of ‘可(ke)+不是(bushi)’ the very first appeared in interrogative sentences in the Tang Dynasty(唐代). In the Yuan Dynasty(元代), the use of ‘可不是(kebushi)’ in rhetorical questions increased greatly. A rhetorical question expresses a positive meaning in the form of a negative. A counter-question modal, ‘可不是 (kebushi); how can it not be ···?’ has the implication of ‘of course it is ···’. In the Qing Dynasty(淸代), ‘可不是(kebushi)’ began to be used alone as a response marker for consent. Next, this study also examined the syntactic reanalysis of ‘可不是(kebushi)’. Reanalysis refers to structural changes that do not change the form of the surface layer. Reanalysis is a condition in which the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’ can be lexicalized. ‘可不是(kebushi)’ has a four-step reanalysis process such as (1) 可(ke)+[[不是(bushi)]+X] → (2) [[可不是(kebushi)]+X] → (3) [可不是(kebushi)] → (4) [可不(是)kebu(shi)].
This study considered the mechanisms for the formation of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’ as ‘pragmatic inference’ and ‘contextinduced absorption’. Above all, from the counter-question modal, ‘可不是(kebushi)’, ‘how can it not be ···?’ is inferred the implication of affirmation, ‘of course it is ···’. The subjective feeling of affirmation about an event is very naturally inferred once again as the implicative meaning of ‘consent’. In addition, ‘可不是(kebushi)’ absorbs the context of the rhetorical question and connects with a positive meaning.
It is hoped that the analysis of this study will be helpful in understanding the discourse function and lexicalization process of the response marker ‘可不是(kebushi)’.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. ‘可不是’의 담화 응답 기능 분류
Ⅲ. ‘可不是’의 어휘화 과정
Ⅳ. 응답표지어 ‘可不是’ 형성의 기제
Ⅴ. 나오며
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
現代漢語話語標記“可不是”的語用功能與形成機制
중국어문학논집
2021 .10
-
脱動詞化にみられる文法的な意味と機能の存続 -動詞条件形の脱動詞化を中心に-
일본연구
2019 .08
-
Lexicalization Patterns and Lexical Inferencing
언어와언어학
2020 .01
-
한국어 담화표지에 대한 고찰 : 담화표지의 정체 및 형성의 문제와 관련하여
한국어학
2019 .05
-
The Origins of /h/-Final Nouns in Middle Korean
어학연구
2023 .12
-
국어 담화표지화에 관한 연구
한말연구
2021 .12
-
담화 표지어 indeed의 의미화용적 기능에 관한 연구
언어과학
2019 .01
-
한중 담화표지 대조연구 : 개념과 특징을 중심으로
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
한국어 담화표지 연구의 현황과 과제
한말연구
2017 .01
-
중국어 담화표지어 유형 및 중한 대조 연구
담화와인지
2016 .02
-
한국어 교육에서의 담화 표지에 대한 접근의 현황과 방향성
한중인문학연구
2015 .01
-
한⸱중 담화표지의 통사⸱화용 특징 대조
중국어문학논집
2020 .12
-
‘네/예’의 담화 기능과 운율 특성
한국어학
2018 .11
-
영화 <어바웃 타임>에 나타난 담화표지 번역 양상 분석 및 번역 대안 제시- ‘well’ 과 ‘you know‘를 중심으로
동화와 번역
2019 .01
-
Evidence for ‘like’ as a Focus Marker
어학연구
2021 .04
-
한국어 발화 말 담화표지 연구-감탄사 유래 담화표지를 중심으로-
반교어문연구
2021 .08
-
三島文学における｢怪物｣的女性像 : ｢近代家族｣の発生と受容をめぐって
동아인문학
2018 .12
-
중국인 한국어 학습자의 이동사건 어휘화 양상 연구
국제언어문학
2022 .08
-
복합형 담화표지 연구
담화와인지
2024 .11
-
중국인 학습자의 말하기 대회에 나타난 담화표지 사용 양상 연구
대학교양교육연구
2017 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-720-001713167