지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.104 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2023.5
- 수록면
- 249 - 257 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) has been developed with the aim of improving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to provide better aesthetic and functional outcomes for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare overall quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with breast reconstruction in patients undergoing BCS and OPS using the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and recently validated QLQ-Breast Reconstruction module (QLQ-BRECON23).
Methods: A total of 87 patients were included in this single-center study between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021; 43 underwent OPS (49.4%) and 44 underwent BCS (50.6%). The data on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were obtained from the prospectively collected database at the hospital. QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BRECON23 were used to evaluate psychosocial well-being, fatigue symptoms, overall QoL, sexual well-being, sensation of the operative area, and satisfaction with the reconstruction.
Results: According to QLQ-C30 evaluation there were significantly better outcomes for patients treated with OPS than BCS in terms of psychosocial well-being, fatigue symptoms, and overall QoL (P = 0.005, P = 0.016, and P = 0.004; respectively), according to QLQ-BRECON23 evaluation there were also significantly better outcomes in terms of sexual well-being, sensation of the operative area, and satisfaction of the reconstruction (P ＜ 0.001, P = 0.002, and P ＜ 0.001; respectively).
Conclusion: We found that the overall QoL and satisfaction with breast reconstruction in patients undergoing OPS are better than those undergoing BCS. Our study is critical because it is the first study comparing OPS and BCS using the QLQBRECON23, which was recently validated.
Methods: A total of 87 patients were included in this single-center study between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021; 43 underwent OPS (49.4%) and 44 underwent BCS (50.6%). The data on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were obtained from the prospectively collected database at the hospital. QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BRECON23 were used to evaluate psychosocial well-being, fatigue symptoms, overall QoL, sexual well-being, sensation of the operative area, and satisfaction with the reconstruction.
Results: According to QLQ-C30 evaluation there were significantly better outcomes for patients treated with OPS than BCS in terms of psychosocial well-being, fatigue symptoms, and overall QoL (P = 0.005, P = 0.016, and P = 0.004; respectively), according to QLQ-BRECON23 evaluation there were also significantly better outcomes in terms of sexual well-being, sensation of the operative area, and satisfaction of the reconstruction (P ＜ 0.001, P = 0.002, and P ＜ 0.001; respectively).
Conclusion: We found that the overall QoL and satisfaction with breast reconstruction in patients undergoing OPS are better than those undergoing BCS. Our study is critical because it is the first study comparing OPS and BCS using the QLQBRECON23, which was recently validated.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
즉시 유방재건술을 받은 유방암 환자의 수술만족도와 삶의 질
Asian Oncology Nursing
2020 .03
-
Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery and Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Journal of Breast Cancer
2021 .12
-
Comparison of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Breast- Conserving Surgery Alone: A Meta-Analysis
Journal of Breast Cancer
2018 .01
-
How to optimize aesthetic outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2018 .01
-
Cosmetic outcomes and patients’ satisfaction of oncoplastic surgery in Korean patient with breast cancer
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2015 .12
-
Devising A New Surgical Procedure of Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Predictors of Decreased Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors Five Years After Diagnosis
Journal of Breast Cancer
2023 .06
-
Applicability of Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery in Asian Breast Cancer Patients
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
-
Breast Implant Infections after Surgical Reconstruction in Patients with Breast Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Trends in breast reconstruction: Implications for the National Health Insurance Service
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2018 .01
-
Oncologic safety of breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients under the age of 35
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2017 .06
-
Chronological changes in quality of life and body composition after gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2020 .05
-
Impact of Body Mass Index on the Quality of Life after Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Cancer Research and Treatment
2018 .01
-
Development and Application of Customized 3D Printing Breast Surgical Guide for Precise Breast Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
Evaluation of Factors Impacting Cosmetic Outcome of Breast Conservative Surgery - a Study in Iran
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
-
New Methods of Implant Based Breast Reconstruction
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
Breast reconstruction statistics in Korea from the Big Data Hub of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2018 .01
-
Chemotherapy and Radiation Treatment for Breast Reconstruction Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
유방보존술 후 흡수성 메쉬 삽입에 대한 결과와 환자의 만족도
Journal of Breast Disease
2017 .12
-
Reliability and Validity of an Iranian Version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: the EORTC QLQ-MY20
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-514-001360604