메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이종근 (동아대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제32권 제2호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
33 - 62 (30page)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34267/cblj.2021.32.2.33

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Elementary and Secondary Education Act(hereinafter ESEA) Article 8 (1) prescribes that the head of a school may enact or amend school regulations within the extent of statutes or regulations(so called ‘pubryung’). On the other hand, according to the constitutional law, local governments may enact provisions relating to local autonomy(i.e. ordinances), within the limit of Acts and subordinate statutes(this, too called ‘pubryung’)(Constitution of the Republic of Korea Article 117(1)). So, it is problematic that which of the two ‘pubryung’s takes precedence over the other in its effect. In other words, it is a question of whether school regulations may be in conflict with ordinances in their substance. In this regard, it is a question of whether what the ‘pubryung’(“statutes or regulations” or “acts and subordinate statutes”) means; whether the ‘pubryung’ encompasses the ordinances; whether if the ordinances are included in the ‘pubryung’, it may be possible to conclude that school regulations should not violate the student human rights ordinances. Article 18-4 of the ESEA stipulates that founders, managers, and heads of schools shall guarantee the human rights of students provided in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea and International Covenants on Human Rights. Because the student human rights ordinances are enacted in deference to the spirit of the stipulation of the ESEA, we can conclude that the school regulations could not contravene the student human rights ordinances.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0