메뉴 건너뛰기
내서재 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

Development of Evaluative Indicator of SAFETY Education for KOREA Army
추천
검색

Development of Evaluative Indicator of SAFETY Education for KOREA Army

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jung Byong-sam (Korea Army Academy at Yeongchoen Yeongcheon Republic of Korea)
저널정보
J-INSTITUTE International Journal of Crisis & Safety International Journal of Crisis & Safety 제3권 제1호 KCI Candidated Journals
발행연도
2018.3
수록면
25 - 31 (7page)

이용수

표지
Development of Evaluative Indicator of SAFETY Education for KOREA Army
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose; This paper intends to develop evaluation indicators of safety education for the Republic of Kore Army(ROKA) personnel. In Korea, there are a lot of accidents and disasters that Korean people had never been experienced including earthquakes, fire casualties, and marine accidents. There are many physical and psychological risk factors including explosion, injury, fire, traffic acci-dent, and psychological violence, etc. Researchers suggest that ROKA soldiers are vulnerable to dai-ly risk factors but do not receive enough safety education due to the lack of appropriate manual, instructor, and time. This study thoroughly reviewed the literature including the US Army field manual on the safety education and studies of industrial safety. Seventeen areas of safety man-agement in the military bases were described in the field manual and counter-measures of each area were reviewed. Thirty evaluative indicators were presented based on the literature review and the value of each indicator was suggested as a milestone for designing and conducting the safety education. The 30 indicators are composed based on the CIPP(context-input-process-product) model and each of the indicator implies theoretical meanings and practical suggestions. The indica-tors begin with analyzing the hazard of the workplace and they contain : (1)collecting and analyz-ing the hazards in the workplace, (2)collecting and analyzing the information about the health management system, (3)making the safety management plan in the workplace, (4)reflecting the opinions of military personnel in making the safety management plan, (5)investigating the imple-mentation of health education and evaluation for military personnel, (6)reflecting the military per-sonnel’s need for health and safety education, (7)evaluating the leader’s interest in the safety and health promotion, (8)investigating the military personnel's consciousness of safety, (9)employment of officer in charge of safety management, (10)percentage of the officers in charge of the safety management, (11)employment of the officers in charge of safety and health education, (12)qualification of the officers in charge of the safety and health education, (13)presence of de-partment of safety and health management and education, (14)volume of contents of the safety and health education, (15)Percentage of budget for safety and health education, (16)implementation of regulations on safety and health, (17)specification of educational objectives on safety, (18)review of the appropriateness of the safety education objectives, (19)diversity of educational method for the safety education, (20)specification of the safety education contents, (21)implementation of the educational plan, (22)checking the military personnel's awareness of the safety objectives, (23)the military personnel's satisfaction in the safety education, (24)participation of the military personnel in the safety education, (25)availability of resources for the safety educa-tion, (26)communication about the contents of the safety education, (27)changes in the conscious-ness of the safety, (28)changes in the knowledge of the safety, (29)changes in the attitude toward the safety, (30)changes in the real actions in the safety management and implementation.
#Safety #Republic of Korea Army #Safety Education #Evaluation #Indicator

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청
이명선 / 2006 / 산업장 안전보건교육 관리요인 / 보건교육건강증진학회지 23(2):121~140 dbpia Gregg L / 1991 / Worker Training: An Investment in Safety / Occupational Hazards 53(8):3~10 google schola Ajala EM / 2001 / The Influence of Workplace Environment on Workers’ Welfare, Performance, and Productivity / The African Symposium 12(1):141~144 google schola Hedge, A / 2000 / Where are We in Understanding the Effect of Where We are? / Ergonomics 43(7):1019~1029 google schola Nahrgang JD / 2007 / Predicting Safety Performance: A Meta-analysis of Safety and Work Performance / Journal of Applied Psychology 65:96~102 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0