메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이유현 (아주대학교) 이채정 (국회미래연구원)
저널정보
한국비교정부학회 한국비교정부학보 한국비교정부학보 제25권 제3호
발행연도
2021.9
수록면
51 - 68 (18page)
DOI
10.18397/kcgr.2021.25.3.51

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
(Purpose) This study aims to present the direction of future public healthcare service delivery systems through in-depth comparative analysis in France and Korea. Through this paper, we aims to understand how government and market relationships are established to provide social services in the two countries. We also expect to be able to identify its differential characteristics. (Design/methodology/approach) A two-step qualitative approach is conducted. First, the research examines the commonalities and differences of the public healthcare service delivery system in France and Korea, which are considered as social insurance-based welfare states. Second, the study evaluates the role of the state-to-market among countries with similar social welfare systems. For the comparison, Germany and Japan, social insurance-based welfare states, are chosen as the comparative groups. (Findings) The characteristics of the public healthcare service delivery system in France and Korea are analyzed. Additionally, the level of government intervention in the public healthcare service delivery systems is measured. According to the analysis, France has a low rate of self-charge, and the proportion of healthcare, public hospitals, and public beds among public funds was high. Therefore, France is more of a complete government intervention model. Subsequently, in Korea, the percentage of self-payment was high, and the percentage of healthcare, public hospitals, and public beds was low among public funds. Thus, Korea is close to a complete market intervention model and has the opposite public healthcare service delivery system compared to France. (Research implications or Originality) This study presents some rationales for expanding public hospitals and beds in align with the reinforcement of the publicness of health service. The two-stage qualitative analysis methodology identified the characteristics of the public healthcare service delivery systems of both countries.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0