메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
백낙승 (강원대학교)
저널정보
미국소설학회 미국소설 미국소설 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2017.7
수록면
43 - 73 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to investigate how Ernest Hemingway’s central ideas develop in his moral values’ perspective. The general logical discussion here is based on the evidence that Hemingway’s views of morality evolve from an individualistic one through a humanistic one to an ecological one by three stages. Hemingway has a moral belief that what is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after. His morality can be interpreted as a code of conduct capable of establishing human dignity which makes one feel good after. In the early stage of his writing career, his protagonists such as Nick, Jake Barnes and Frederic Henry tend to follow their individualistic morality in their own ways of solving their disillusionments and anxieties in their struggles to come to terms with a world they cannot possibly understand. In the middle stage, Hemingway’s literary concern is marked by a conspicuous change from individualism to social commitment and humanism deeply influenced by the Great Depression and the Spanish Civil War. To Have and Have Not and For Whom the Bell Tolls dramatically demonstrate the writer’s spirit of social commitment and universal brotherhood. In The Old Man and the Sea of the final stage, the protagonist embodies his mature universal love of all creatures by achieving his ecological enlightenment. Santiago here reaches a loftiest realization in his struggles of life, which differentiates him from the earlier protagonists.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0