메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
남승숙 (한남대학교)
저널정보
대한영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제47권 제3호
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
19 - 38 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the limits of rational thought in Ian McEwan’s novel Children Act from the perspective of Bakhtin’s dialogism, and explores its alternatives. Children Act deals with court cases surrounding children, and they mainly contain the unsolvable struggle between religion and science, which are the most powerful in modern society. A competent judge, Fiona Maye, believes that she makes decisions that are in the best interests and well-being of children by providing a rational perspective. The protagonist, Adam, suffering from leukemia but rejecting a blood transfusion because of Jehovah’s Witnesses doctrine, recovers from illness by Fiona’s rational judgment for blood transfusion. Having gained a new life, he relies on Fiona and wants to inter-communicate with her, but Fiona, who is lost in rational thought, cuts off personal communication with him. His tragedy of choosing to die by refusing a blood transfusion points out the limits of Fiona’s rational thought. It is believed that rational thought, which excludes emotion and relies on reason, can be supplemented from the dialogic perspective, which should be based on inter-communication with others. The dialogic view that human life consists of others’ language, that is, dialogism, will be able to supplement the limit of rational thought.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0