메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Yulgok's Emphasis on the Will of Practicing Morality and the Riding Horse Metaphor
Recommendations
Search

人乘馬 비유를 통해 본 율곡 이이의 도덕실천 지향의지

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
LEE CHEON SUNG (성균관대학교)
Journal
한국동양철학회 동양철학 동양철학 제50호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2018.12
Pages
211 - 243 (33page)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.19065/japk.2018.12.50.211

Usage

cover
Yulgok's Emphasis on the Will of Practicing Morality and the Riding Horse Metaphor
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This paper deals with Yulgok’s riding horse metaphor and its meaning of morality. Yulgok considered that one should distinguish renxin (人心) and daoxin (道心) by the difference in their views on practice of morality. Thus, Yulgok strongly insists that they should be comprehended in one dimension. When Yulgok had a controversy with Ugye, Ugye used riding horse metaphor and he insists one should focus on the person who is riding a horse. In other words, it means that one should set importance on daoxin as daoxin controls our mind. However, it also means that there is origin of morality and also at the same time there is situational morality. On the contrary, Yulgok insists that when one is riding a horse, then one could not totally trust a horse, because it’s not the nature of horse to satisfy human. Yulgok claims that like men train horses for riding, one should make changes on one’s physical constitution for practicing morality. Yulgok also insists that as all human beings have free will to pursue goodness, one only needs to make change on one’s physical nature. Furthermore, Yulgok claims yuanliushuo (原流說) to strengthen his prior argument. The main idea of yuanliushuo (原流說) is that, all things have a same origins but each becomes different through the process of changing[原一而流二]. In the sense of human mind, there are daoxin and renxin , they are both human mind, but the diffrence is that one mainly focuses on the aspects of li理 and the other on the aspects of qi (氣). In Yulgok’s argument renxin and daoxin can be distinguished by the views on human will of practicing morality. However, it does not mean that renxin and daoxin are different from beginning. One should comprehend Yulgok’s insistence on renxin and daoxin as his emphasis on human will on practicing morality.

Contents

No content found

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.