지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Wang Fuzhi’s(王夫之) comments on the literature of the Six Dynasties have extremely important value in the history of poetry. Before Wang Fuzhi, no scholar had fully affirmed and praised the literature of the Six Dynasties like him. This is mainly because his conclusion was based on the selection of poetry in the past. This is different from the generalization of those general commentators. Wang Fuzhi’s affirmation of Six Dynasties literature is mainly reflected in six aspects. First, he refuted the theory of “rise from decline”(起衰論). In his opinion, the Song’s theory of “rise from decline”(起衰論) was wrong. Compared with the Tang Dynasty, the literature of the Six Dynasties was not a decline. The poetry of the Six Dynasties inherited the Zhou-Han(周漢) and opened the Tang Dynasty. The Six Dynasties should not be regarded as a decline. Second, the poems of the Six Dynasties preceded the poems of the Tang Dynasty. The most mature modern-style poems in the Tang Dynasty originated in the Six Dynasties; Tang poetry often drew nourishment from the Six Dynasties poems, and most of fine verses came from the Six Dynasties. In terms of subject matter, technique, structure, rhyme, and words, they were all influenced by the Six Dynasties literature. Fourth, there are differences in the literature of the Six Dynasties. Wang Fuzhi divided it into three stages: Jin-Song(晉宋), Qi-Liang(齊梁), and Chen-Sui(陳隋). In general, it was the highest in the Jin-Song dynasties. However, even so, he did not deny Qi-Liang or Chen-Sui completely. Fifth, Wang Fuzhi also had a unique understanding of the poetic styles of the Six Dynasties. For example, he respected the Five-character poem of Jin-Song Dynasties, and believed that the Four-character poem of Shen Yue(沈約) were the best, and Xiao Yi(蕭繹) Seven-character quatrain was the vowel of the past dynasties. Sixth, it has pioneering and exemplary significance in the discussion of situational affair. The aspects of sentiment and scenery, matter and emotion, reason and poetry fully embodied his dialectical concept, which neither negated the scenery, matter, and reason in poetry, but also took care of emotion and essence.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
王夫之 四書學의 특징과 淸代 實學으로의 전환
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
王夫之 ‘情景交融’論과 王國維 ‘境界’論의 相關性
중국어문논총
2016 .10
-
李白＜贈＞詩 譯解 및 考察(7) — 제30수에서 제31수까지
중국어문논총
2019 .01
-
李白 ＜贈＞詩 譯解 및 考察(8) — 제32수에서 제34수까지
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
王夫之 ≪薑齋文集⋅九昭≫ 역해(3)
중국어문논총
2021 .08
-
文?作品句子?面??模糊性及其???究－以≪唐?三百首≫?例－
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
金代 중기 王庭筠 시 연구
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
왕부지의 ‘衣裳’觀 고찰
철학∙사상∙문화
2023 .06
-
橘山 李裕元의 燕行과 記錄 - 『燕槎日錄』을 중심으로 -
동방한문학
2022 .06
-
王維 連作詩 章法 分析
중국어문학논집
2023 .12
-
신동문의 시 전집에 누락된 시편 연구
한국시학연구
2020 .02
-
王夫之 ≪薑齋文集⋅章靈賦≫ 역해(2)
중국어문논총
2024 .07
-
王夫之 史論에 보이는 ‘道統論’의 역사성
중국사연구
2018 .01
-
우리말 (외 1수)
중국조선어문
2018 .11
-
王夫之的經文關係論
중국어문논총
2021 .08
-
李白〈贈〉詩 譯解(3) : 제11수에서 제16수까지
중국문화연구
2015 .08
-
王夫之의 비판적 『노자』 해석과 그 한계에 관한 고찰 : 『老子衍』에 대한 분석을 중심으로
도교문화연구
2022 .05
-
高丽文人对王维诗的接受
중국학
2015 .01
-
현대 장시(長詩)의 본질과 범주에 대한 재고찰
한국현대문학연구
2017 .08
-
王夫之 ≪薑齋文集?九昭≫ 역해(2)
중국어문논총
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0