메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조유민 (Chungnam National University Hospital) Park Seyeon (Department of Nursing College of Nursing Chungnam National University) 오차현 (Chungnam National University Hospital) Pak Yujin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Chungnam National University Hospital) Jeong Kuhee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Chungnam National University Hospital) Yun Sangwon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Chungnam National University Hospital Daejeon Korea) Noh Chan (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Chungnam National University Hospital) 정우석 (충남대학교) 김윤희 (충남대학교) 고영권 (충남대학교병원) 홍부휘 (충남대학교)
저널정보
대한마취통증의학회(구 대한마취과학회) Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.75 No.3
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
231 - 244 (14page)
DOI
10.4097/kja.21330

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of regional analgesic interventions for VATS using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: We searched the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the analgesic effects of the following interventions: control, thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), serratus plane block (SPB), and intercostal nerve block (INB). The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24-h postoperative period. Pain scores were also collected during three different postoperative periods: the early (0?6 h), middle (6?18 h), and late (18?24 h) periods. Results: A total of 21 RCTs (1391 patients) were included. TPVB showed the greatest effect on opioid consumption compared with the control (mean difference [MD] = ?13.2 mg; 95% CI [?16.2, ?10.1]). In terms of pain scores in the early period, ESPB had the greatest effect compared to control (MD = ?1.6; 95% CI [?2.3, ?0.9]). In the middle and late periods, pain scores showed that TPVB, ESPB and INB had superior analgesic effects compared to controls, while SPB did not. Conclusions: TPVB had the best analgesic efficacy following VATS, though the analgesic efficacy of ESPBs was comparable. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal regional analgesia technique to improve postoperative pain control following VATS.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0