지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Chinese character is an ideographic, also we can called semantic script, every characters shape already has own meaning. Some of the Chinese Characters has same components but when make one Characters use different positions. The change in position is also related to the meaning of Chinese characters. For example, 忙 and 忘 are with the same components as 心 and 亡, but two characters own meaning ‘busy’ and ‘forgetting’, due to two components have a different positions in Characters, So we can know Chinese characters components and position of components also can affect the meaning of characters.
“Even if it is the same components, it affects the meaning of Chinese characters depending on the different components position” is one of the long-standing arguments in the Chinese character Study Society. If so, it can be estimate that there is a semantic correlation between some of Chinese characters with one components in the same position.
To verify this, this study examined the this speculation, by the ‘iconicity’ theory and semantic field theory analysed characters that include ‘心’ components in the ≪Xiandai Hanyucidian 现代汉语词典≫ and ≪Shuowenjiezi说文解字≫.
‘心’ components have three different shape 心, 忄, 㣺 by positions that used in some Characters. This Three shape only one shape before “Libian” period, only different positions in some Characters. the theory of this paper is that the semantic relationship will also differ depending on the different positions. The subjects of this study are a total of 128 characters, with 36 characters in the form of a 心, 90 characters in the form of a 忄, and 2 characters in the form of a 㣺. Through the study, the semantic relationship of Chinese characters could be analyzed in a parametric approach by connecting the positions of the Chinese characters meanings.
As a result of the analysis, the vocabulary in each semantic field formed a derivative meaning that is somewhat far from the meaning of ‘heart’, which is the true meaning and basic meaning of heart, and they mainly formed vocabulary with [+emotion] and [+perception]. More than half of them had [+emotion] semantics and created words that represented various human emotions, and these characteristics were prominent in the fields of 心and 忄. On the other hand, in terms of emotional color, passive and negative colors were much more prominent than equally positive colors in the three semantic fields. In addition, semantic categories differed in the heart, 忄, and 㣺 semantic fields, followed by the 心, 忄, and 㣺 semantic fields. In particular, in the case of Chinese characters belonging to the 忄 shape components, the types of meanings were much more diverse, complex, and productive. Through this, it was confirmed that even if the same components is used, the semantic type differs slightly depending on the different location.
“Even if it is the same components, it affects the meaning of Chinese characters depending on the different components position” is one of the long-standing arguments in the Chinese character Study Society. If so, it can be estimate that there is a semantic correlation between some of Chinese characters with one components in the same position.
To verify this, this study examined the this speculation, by the ‘iconicity’ theory and semantic field theory analysed characters that include ‘心’ components in the ≪Xiandai Hanyucidian 现代汉语词典≫ and ≪Shuowenjiezi说文解字≫.
‘心’ components have three different shape 心, 忄, 㣺 by positions that used in some Characters. This Three shape only one shape before “Libian” period, only different positions in some Characters. the theory of this paper is that the semantic relationship will also differ depending on the different positions. The subjects of this study are a total of 128 characters, with 36 characters in the form of a 心, 90 characters in the form of a 忄, and 2 characters in the form of a 㣺. Through the study, the semantic relationship of Chinese characters could be analyzed in a parametric approach by connecting the positions of the Chinese characters meanings.
As a result of the analysis, the vocabulary in each semantic field formed a derivative meaning that is somewhat far from the meaning of ‘heart’, which is the true meaning and basic meaning of heart, and they mainly formed vocabulary with [+emotion] and [+perception]. More than half of them had [+emotion] semantics and created words that represented various human emotions, and these characteristics were prominent in the fields of 心and 忄. On the other hand, in terms of emotional color, passive and negative colors were much more prominent than equally positive colors in the three semantic fields. In addition, semantic categories differed in the heart, 忄, and 㣺 semantic fields, followed by the 心, 忄, and 㣺 semantic fields. In particular, in the case of Chinese characters belonging to the 忄 shape components, the types of meanings were much more diverse, complex, and productive. Through this, it was confirmed that even if the same components is used, the semantic type differs slightly depending on the different location.
목차
1. 서론
2. 도상성과 의미장에 관하여
3. 연구대상 한자 선정의 과정과 방법
4. 연구 대상 한자 간의 의미 계열성 분석 및 결과
5. 결론
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
新出字形의 접근방법과 판독유형
민족문화
2015 .12
-
한국문헌 소재 이체자 정형화 방안(2)-目이 포함된 자형을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
教育用基础汉字析议
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
-
한자의 이체자 분화 현상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2021 .02
-
文字 訓詁의 視覺에서 본 ‘簡體字表’에서 명시한 주의할 사항에 대한 소고
중국어문학논집
2017 .08
-
現代中國 인터넷 新字 小考
중국문화연구
2019 .11
-
漢字․漢語 敎學方案 연구Ⅲ
중국문학연구
2022 .02
-
한국 한자와 중국 간화자의 학습 상관성에 관한 대학생 인식 및 학습 실태 연구 - 대학 학부생 중국어 학습자를 중심으로
중국문화연구
2019 .08
-
초급중국어 학습자의 한자 및 한자교육에 대한 인식조사 연구 - 전공계열별 분석을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
중국 인명용자 규범의 변화 양상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2018 .02
-
淺談簡化字對漢字敎學的負面影響
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
문․사․철 활용 한자교수법을 위한 제언
중국학
2015 .01
-
說文解字 部首의 字體變遷 硏究 -小篆에서 楷書로의 변이자소를 중심으로-
漢字漢文敎育
2015 .01
-
『通用规范汉字表』의 의의와 한계
중국학
2017 .01
-
试论汉字字形修辞的方式
중국어문논총
2017 .01
-
한국문헌 소재 이체자 정형화 방안 (1) – 口가 포함된 자형을 중심으로 –
동양학
2019 .01
-
異體字에 대한 인문학적 고찰
漢字漢文敎育
2020 .01
-
한자능력검정시험 7급 한자 構形체계의 연구 ― 한국어문회 7급 배정 한자 150자를 대상으로
중국학
2019 .01
-
예비 중국어 교사를 위한 한자 쓰기 어려운 점 논의 - 학습자 의견을 중심으로
중국문화연구
2024 .11
-
≪譯語類解≫異體字類型小考
동아인문학
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000451888