지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第161輯
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 45 (45page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2022.12.161.001
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
How did the critical scholarship doubting the authenticity of ancient texts originate and theorize? In the case of East Asia, one can quickly think of Gu Jiegang 顧頡剛 (1893-1980), the representative of the so-called Doubting Antiquity School. But there must have been a long history advocating the idea preceding Gu Jiegang. Based on the criticism on the discrepancies inherent in the ancient texts such as the Venerated Document (Shangshu) suggested by Wang Chung 王充 (27-96?), Liu Zhiji 劉知幾 (661-721), and Ouyang Xiu 歐陽修 (1007-1072), it was not until the 18th century when the scholarly quest for the cause behind the contradictions indeed began.
The first step in theorizing the doubting of antiquity was the theory of superseding (kajō 加上) proposed by Tominaga Nakamoto 富永仲基(1715-1746). According to Tominaga, competitions between scholars to overcome previous explanations stimulated them to attribute their narratives to far-earlier sages deliberately. It was Cui Shu 崔述 (1740-1816) who applied a similar idea to history and found a fabricating pattern, in which he hypothesized that later the work, the farther in time the purported knowledge of the past is pushed back and the more complex the historical knowledge. All the same, it was not until the early 20th century when Shiratori Kurakichi 白鳥庫吉 (1865-1942) for the first time initiated the iconoclasm of sage kings such as Yao, Shun and Yu as the premise for establishing the doubting antiquity theory. Refining the relatively weak basis of Shiratori’s argument elaborately, Gu Jiegang completed the approach with the idea of the “accumulated creation of ancient history.”
However, the sheer accumulation of archaeological discoveries in China during the second half of the 20th century exposed limitations in the idea of fabricated ancient texts promoted by the Doubting Antiquity School. Especially, Li Ling convincingly points out that they oversymplified the complicated long-term process of textual formation in early China. In this regard, studying the canonization process from the stream of textual tradition in the newly unearthed Warring States bamboo slips would provide a new vista to overcome the limitations inherent in the theory of doubting antiquity.
The first step in theorizing the doubting of antiquity was the theory of superseding (kajō 加上) proposed by Tominaga Nakamoto 富永仲基(1715-1746). According to Tominaga, competitions between scholars to overcome previous explanations stimulated them to attribute their narratives to far-earlier sages deliberately. It was Cui Shu 崔述 (1740-1816) who applied a similar idea to history and found a fabricating pattern, in which he hypothesized that later the work, the farther in time the purported knowledge of the past is pushed back and the more complex the historical knowledge. All the same, it was not until the early 20th century when Shiratori Kurakichi 白鳥庫吉 (1865-1942) for the first time initiated the iconoclasm of sage kings such as Yao, Shun and Yu as the premise for establishing the doubting antiquity theory. Refining the relatively weak basis of Shiratori’s argument elaborately, Gu Jiegang completed the approach with the idea of the “accumulated creation of ancient history.”
However, the sheer accumulation of archaeological discoveries in China during the second half of the 20th century exposed limitations in the idea of fabricated ancient texts promoted by the Doubting Antiquity School. Especially, Li Ling convincingly points out that they oversymplified the complicated long-term process of textual formation in early China. In this regard, studying the canonization process from the stream of textual tradition in the newly unearthed Warring States bamboo slips would provide a new vista to overcome the limitations inherent in the theory of doubting antiquity.
목차
Ⅰ. 문헌 비판과 의고의 전제
Ⅱ. 의고의 선배들
Ⅲ. 최초의 이론화: 토미나가 나카모토(富永仲基, 1715-1746)
Ⅳ. 고대사를 비판한 유학자: 崔述(1740-1816)
Ⅴ. 성왕 지우기: 白鳥庫吉(1865-1942)
Ⅵ. 의고의 정립과 균열: 고힐강(1893-1980)
Ⅶ. 결론: 의고의 학술사적 전망
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 고대문명 연구 100년: 쟁점과 전망
숭실사학
2023 .06
-
‘지식인’에서 ‘지식 노동자’로 — 1950년대 일기에 투영된 顧頡剛 위상의 변모 —
중국근현대사연구
2021 .03
-
陳岸峰:『疑古思潮 與白話文學史的建構 -胡適與顧頡剛』(濟南: 齊魯書社, 2011年)
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
교육적 활용을 위한 ‘刚(刚)’의 다의성 및 담화 기능 연구 - 말뭉치(corpus) 용례 분석을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2021 .01
-
시라토리 구라키치의 ‘만선’과 ‘동양’
한일관계사연구
2020 .11
-
식민지 시기 부산의 일본 기업인 사카타 분키치[坂田文吉]의 사회활동과 전기부영운동
인문사회과학연구
2020 .01
-
조선통신사의 ‘교토체재’와 ‘조선인가도’ - 켐펠의 ‘에도참부여행일기’와의 비교를 통하여 -
일본어문학
2015 .01
-
일본조합교회 가시와기 기엔의 조선인식 연구
일본문화연구
2016 .01
-
유의어 刚，刚才의 의미, 통사론적 특성 연구
중국언어연구
2015 .04
-
일제의 식민정책과 향약 인식 : 1920년대를 중심으로
역사민속학
2015 .11
-
≪宋書≫의 인물묘사 기교와 방법－<本紀>와 <列傳>을 중심으로－
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
개항기(1880~1906) 원산주재 일본영사의 파견과 거류지 행정
학림
2021 .09
-
《?書》的東傳與韓中史料中的?究課題
한중언어문화연구
2015 .02
-
마이클 스콧(Michael Scott) 저 『기원 전후 천년사, 인간 문명의 방향을 설계하다』(Ancient Worlds: A Global History of Antiquity) - 홍지영 옮김, 사계절, 2018 -
Catholic Theology and Thought
2021 .12
-
중국 국가건설 100년의 역정과 역사학(Ⅰ) - 천하 패러다임의 해체와 근대 역사학 -
역사학보
2022 .12
-
浅五了意における中国明末善書文化の受容 : 顔茂猷著『廸吉録』を中心に
일본문화학보
2018 .11
-
沙溪 金長生의 <상서> 해석 -<經書辨疑-書傳>을 중심으로－
태동고전연구
2017 .01
-
백암 박은식과 시라토리 구라키치가 바라본 만주
한일관계사연구
2021 .08
-
심사정 <촉잔도권(蜀棧圖卷)>의 시각 모드 연구
열린정신 인문학연구
2022 .05
-
추이졘(崔健) 록음악에 대한 ‘다위안문화(大院文化)’의 영향과 한국에서 추이졘이 수용되는 방식의 문제
중국어문논총
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000391558