지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
What gave birth to the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) was a question posed in 1950 by Alan Turing, “Can machine think?” Since John McCarthy coined the term at the Dartmouth Forum in 1956, AI began to advance rapidly and now it is anybody’s guess how far the favorite of modern science and technology will develop. In a sense, AI draws a parallel with a mythic Jewish creature called golem. To borrow the expression of a psalmist, golem is an “unformed body” (Psalm 139 : 16). It is an immature creature that is incomplete in form and has no soul and life. In the medieval Jewish folklore, golem serves people but are sometimes hostile to them. Likewise, AI - and robots for that matter - is also an unstable creature that can pose a threat to humans.
Should AI reach the singularity, a tipping point when it becomes smarter than humans, will people embrace it with enthusiasm and enjoy the technological triumph? Erik Brynjolfsson offers a new perspective on AI by questioning whether it is automation or augmentation. In other words, he calls for theological or humanistic reflections on it. In terms of sheer mechanical performance, AI is already ahead of human capacity and will excel even further. What is required of humans, therefore, is not to compete with AI’s scientific and linear logic but to offer a theological paradigm of spiritual and nonlinear progress. Human beings, as long as they are trapped in mechanical automation of AI, cannot but become subordinate to machines. Only with human literacy can people not be subservient to AI nor take a back seat. Human literacy should aim beyond mechanical regeneration or automatic reaction and seek better quality of life, pursue expanded thinking, and strive for spiritual growth.
Once Galilei Galileo and Charles Darwin did, AI has emerged as the biggest threat and challenge to Christianity. If it comes to replace humans in more aspects of life, it will further accelerate the advent of a post-Christianity era. In the attack of advanced science led by AI and robots, a serious question needs to be raised on what the Old Testament is and what the goal of science and technology should be. What does AI have to do with the Old Testament? The Old Testament provides an exponential block logic, not a scientific logic, of explaining what humans are, i.e., a living document. Such an insight, which can be easily overlooked in the age of advanced AI, requires a theological understanding of humans as inalienable beings. Instead of being swept by enthusiasm for cutting-edge technology and disregarding the shadows of new technologies, people need to endeavor theological reflections and sincere dialogue with the Bible. A biblical warning that she may give birth to golem before she goes into labor (Isaiah 66 : 7) is thus worth noting. While “Apocalypse AI” seeks to lead the future of humankind, (Old Testament) theology must take the lead like the tabernacle in the wilderness.
Should AI reach the singularity, a tipping point when it becomes smarter than humans, will people embrace it with enthusiasm and enjoy the technological triumph? Erik Brynjolfsson offers a new perspective on AI by questioning whether it is automation or augmentation. In other words, he calls for theological or humanistic reflections on it. In terms of sheer mechanical performance, AI is already ahead of human capacity and will excel even further. What is required of humans, therefore, is not to compete with AI’s scientific and linear logic but to offer a theological paradigm of spiritual and nonlinear progress. Human beings, as long as they are trapped in mechanical automation of AI, cannot but become subordinate to machines. Only with human literacy can people not be subservient to AI nor take a back seat. Human literacy should aim beyond mechanical regeneration or automatic reaction and seek better quality of life, pursue expanded thinking, and strive for spiritual growth.
Once Galilei Galileo and Charles Darwin did, AI has emerged as the biggest threat and challenge to Christianity. If it comes to replace humans in more aspects of life, it will further accelerate the advent of a post-Christianity era. In the attack of advanced science led by AI and robots, a serious question needs to be raised on what the Old Testament is and what the goal of science and technology should be. What does AI have to do with the Old Testament? The Old Testament provides an exponential block logic, not a scientific logic, of explaining what humans are, i.e., a living document. Such an insight, which can be easily overlooked in the age of advanced AI, requires a theological understanding of humans as inalienable beings. Instead of being swept by enthusiasm for cutting-edge technology and disregarding the shadows of new technologies, people need to endeavor theological reflections and sincere dialogue with the Bible. A biblical warning that she may give birth to golem before she goes into labor (Isaiah 66 : 7) is thus worth noting. While “Apocalypse AI” seeks to lead the future of humankind, (Old Testament) theology must take the lead like the tabernacle in the wilderness.
목차
1. 여는 글
2. 인공지능의 출현과 네 가지 유형
1. 인공지능의 활용과 (구약) 신학의 과제
4. ‘알고리듬’과 ‘살아있는 인간문서’로 본 인공지능
5. 새로운 문해력과 인공지능
6. 맺는 글
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
AI 의사를 아시나요?
인물과사상
2019 .08
-
AI 시대의 도래와 교회의 미래: AI의 현실에 관한 분석과 교회에 끼칠 영향 진단
신학전망
2022 .03
-
AI 윤리교육의 필요성과 내용 구성에 관한 연구
인공지능인문학연구
2021 .08
-
소설 가르치는 로봇 － 생성 AI를 활용한 문학교육 교수‧학습 전략과 사례
비평문학
2023 .12
-
AI 저자의 텍스트를 읽는 인간 독자의 자세: AI 시대의 비판적 문식성
독서연구
2024 .08
-
A Study on Theological Students’ Perception of Artificial Intelligence and the Christian Educational Implications
기독교교육 논총
2020 .01
-
폴 틸리히의 신학의 관점에서 본 AI 설교의 가능성과 한계
신학논단
2023 .09
-
AI 창작 기술에 따른 인공지능 소설의 유형 분석: 『파르마코—AI』, 『지금부터의 세계』, 『길 위 1번지』를 중심으로
현대영어영문학
2024 .05
-
중국의 인공지능(AI) 윤리 정책에 관한 연구
중국학
2022 .09
-
인공지능 시대와 미래 리터러시의 향방 - 인공지능 시대와 리터러시 선언문 -
동서철학연구
2021 .12
-
AI 시대의 외국어 교육용 AI 분석을 위한 평가지표 구축
선교와 신학
2024 .10
-
중국 예비교사의 AI 교육에 대한 인식 및 AI 교수효능감 분석
인공지능인문학연구
2024 .04
-
초등 국어과 AI 리터러시 융합 교육을 위한 예비적 고찰
한국초등국어교육
2023 .04
-
일본과 중국의 대학 AI 교양 교육 현황 분석 및 제언 - AI 리터러시 교양 교육 중심으로 -
인공지능인문학연구
2021 .01
-
소설 쓰는 로봇 - ChatGPT와 AI 생성 문학 -
한국문예비평연구
2023 .03
-
영화 속에서 나타난 인공지능의 인간화와 인간지배 현상 연구- 신체가 있는 인공지능과 하이퍼 인공지능을 중심으로 -
인공지능인문학연구
2022 .04
-
AI 리터러시 개념 설정과 교양교육 설계를 위한 연구
어문론집
2021 .03
-
인공지능 로봇과 인간의 관계에 대한 윤리적 성찰과 전망
영어권문화연구
2017 .01
-
자율 AI 책임에 관한 비판적 연구
윤리연구
2021 .12
-
AI의 탄생, 그 진실과 거짓
인문학연구
2024 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
‘까닭 없는 하나님 경외’에 대한 사탄의 질문과 욥의 응답: 욥기 1: 9ff와 19: 6-20, 25-27의 비교를 중심으로
구자용
구약논단
2024
.06
부자 요셉과 욥의 비교에 관한 연구
임병진
,
임태순
행복한 부자연구
2024
.06
[구약성서에 나타난 멜랑콜리아 02] 욥과 멜랑콜리아: 산다는 것이 이렇게 괴로우니(욥 10:1a)
김선종
기독교사상
2024
.01
탄소 중립과 생태 위기 시대의 욥기 읽기: 소발의 담화를 중심으로(욥 11-12)
박혜경
Canon&Culture
2023
.10
[작품론] 우리 시대의 ‘욥’을 위하여 - 「욥의 슬픔을 아시나요」 연작에 대하여
김재홍
계간 서정시학
2023
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0