지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第160輯
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 117 - 170 (54page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2022.9.160.117
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores Mongol legal culture and its method of realizing justice by reconstructing the operation of the ǰarɤu as “a trial” in the Mongol state in the 13th and 14th centuries and identifying the institution’s effects on the empire. Despite its historical importance, the Mongol ǰarɤu has not been given sufficient attention by historians.
The ǰarɤu, both a bench trial and a joint trial, inherited the universal legal culture of the Mongol steppe. The ǰarɤuči, civil officials, envoys, or community-leaders conducted joint hearings and trials endorsed by joint signature or sealing. The advent of both the name and practice of ǰarɤu thus heralded a new pluralistic legal culture in East Asia.
The ǰarɤu consisted of three elements: appointment (yuehui 約會), joint discussion and settlement (gongyi 共議 and 斷事 duanshi), and ǰarɤuči and envoys (chailai guan 差來官). These elements acted either independently or collectively as they spread throughout the empire and, as a consequence, evolved diversely. For example, the ǰarɤu found broad acceptance as the yārghū in the Persian culture. In Islamic society, the yārghū functioned as a joint trial in which the yārghūchīs of the great amirs, shaikhs, and qāḍīs gathered to decide cases. The three elements of the ǰarɤu translated into Chinese culture and transformed the institution in various ways. The ǰarɤu was interpreted and transformed into six different vocabularies in Chinese culture beyond its transliteration of the zhaerhu 札兒忽: liwen 理問, huiwen 會問, yuewen 約問, juwen 聚問, zawen 雜問, and zazhi 雜治.
As the ǰarɤu’s translations and variants continued the practice of joint or group discussion, Mongol-style justice penetrated the whole territory of the great Qan. In the wake of imperial expansion, ǰarɤu began to appear not only to China, Korea, Uyghuristan, Central Asia, and Persia, places far beyond the Mongolian steppes, to peoples of various religions and ethnicities.
In short, the ǰarɤu constituted the legal culture of the steppe tradition and the universal litigation and trial system of the Mongol empire. It could achieve unity within the empire while instituting “open” justice through a mobile network under the principles of the yuehui (appointment), joint discussion, and the mobility of judges. It also introduced an innovative form of pluralism thanks to its system of joint interrogation and trial. The ǰarɤu continued to play a role in East Asian legal culture, in such forms as the huishen 會審 in Ming China and the jabchi 雜治 (zazhi in Chinese) of Joseon Korea. Accordingly, it helped to dismantle the traditional legal system of the lüling 律令 that prevailed since after the Tang dynasty.
The ǰarɤu, both a bench trial and a joint trial, inherited the universal legal culture of the Mongol steppe. The ǰarɤuči, civil officials, envoys, or community-leaders conducted joint hearings and trials endorsed by joint signature or sealing. The advent of both the name and practice of ǰarɤu thus heralded a new pluralistic legal culture in East Asia.
The ǰarɤu consisted of three elements: appointment (yuehui 約會), joint discussion and settlement (gongyi 共議 and 斷事 duanshi), and ǰarɤuči and envoys (chailai guan 差來官). These elements acted either independently or collectively as they spread throughout the empire and, as a consequence, evolved diversely. For example, the ǰarɤu found broad acceptance as the yārghū in the Persian culture. In Islamic society, the yārghū functioned as a joint trial in which the yārghūchīs of the great amirs, shaikhs, and qāḍīs gathered to decide cases. The three elements of the ǰarɤu translated into Chinese culture and transformed the institution in various ways. The ǰarɤu was interpreted and transformed into six different vocabularies in Chinese culture beyond its transliteration of the zhaerhu 札兒忽: liwen 理問, huiwen 會問, yuewen 約問, juwen 聚問, zawen 雜問, and zazhi 雜治.
As the ǰarɤu’s translations and variants continued the practice of joint or group discussion, Mongol-style justice penetrated the whole territory of the great Qan. In the wake of imperial expansion, ǰarɤu began to appear not only to China, Korea, Uyghuristan, Central Asia, and Persia, places far beyond the Mongolian steppes, to peoples of various religions and ethnicities.
In short, the ǰarɤu constituted the legal culture of the steppe tradition and the universal litigation and trial system of the Mongol empire. It could achieve unity within the empire while instituting “open” justice through a mobile network under the principles of the yuehui (appointment), joint discussion, and the mobility of judges. It also introduced an innovative form of pluralism thanks to its system of joint interrogation and trial. The ǰarɤu continued to play a role in East Asian legal culture, in such forms as the huishen 會審 in Ming China and the jabchi 雜治 (zazhi in Chinese) of Joseon Korea. Accordingly, it helped to dismantle the traditional legal system of the lüling 律令 that prevailed since after the Tang dynasty.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 자르구(ǰarɤu)의 원형: 단독·공동심판
3. 자르구의 제국적 확산과 변용
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
몽골제국은 어떻게 법을 집행했는가? - 訴訟과 約會의 재구성 -
동양사학연구
2020 .03
-
James Joyce, the “Wonder Worker,” and Inventions
제임스조이스 저널
2019 .01
-
The Invention of Monolingualism
번역하다
2022 .04
-
시행학습(trial-learning)의 이론, 전략 그리고 실천
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
발명 개념에 대한 철학적 탐구 : 베르그손과 시몽동의 기술철학을 중심으로
철학연구
2016 .03
-
合評會 - 일본문화 -
일본문화학보
2019 .11
-
合評會 - 일본문화 -
일본문화학보
2020 .08
-
合評會 - 일본문화Ⅱ
일본문화학보
2018 .08
-
合評會 - 일본문화Ⅱ
일본문화학보
2018 .11
-
訓民正音 創制 目的의 考察 : 世宗 時代의 政治․社會的 狀況과 관련하여
인문과학연구
2015 .06
-
웹 기반 임상시험의 윤리적 고찰-재택기반 의약품 임상시험 사례를 중심으로-
인격주의 생명윤리
2018 .01
-
기축옥사의 비극적 사건과 기억들
한국인물사연구
2015 .03
-
合評會 -일본문학-
일본문화학보
2025 .02
-
合評會 - 일본문학 -
일본문화학보
2022 .08
-
合評會 - 일본문학 -
일본문화학보
2020 .05
-
合評會 - 일본문학 -
일본문화학보
2019 .05
-
문화콘텐츠와 문화콘텐츠학 개념에 대한 메타 비평 : 문화연구와 문화콘텐츠학의 비교 고찰 견지에서
인문콘텐츠
2024 .12
-
음악교육의 관점에서 바라본 정간보 창안의 주체
공연문화연구
2018 .01
-
배심원모의재판토론 수업운영 방안 : 의사소통교육과 민주시민 법교육을 위한 대학교양과정
수사학
2015 .03
-
외설과 법, 판례의 탄생 — 1960년대 ‘문예 재판’과 외설 담론 연구 —
개념과 소통
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0