지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
사람들의 완악해짐은 예수가 비유를 사용한 목적인가 결과인가? — 마가복음 4:12의 ἵνα 해석 —
Is the Hardening of People the Purpose or the Result of Jesus' Use of Parable?: Interpreting ἵνα in Mark 4:12
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제51호 KCI등재
- 발행연도
- 2022.10
- 수록면
- 151 - 169 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2022.10.51.151
이용수
사람들의 완악해짐은 예수가 비유를 사용한 목적인가 결과인가? — 마가복음 4:12의 ἵνα 해석 —
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article explores the following questions: How should we interpret inἵνα in Mark 4:12? Is it used as a purpose clause or a result clause? In order to answer these questions, previous studies tend to focus on grammatical and linguistic issues. The problem is that both positions provide all convincing evidence and arguments. Thus, previous studies offer not much contribution to the issue of determining the meaning of ἵνα clause despite their usefulness. Since previous studies have come to a dead end, this article suggests that scholars should find different avenues of research to resolve this crucial interpretive issue. This article intends to fill this gap by studying three areas: (1) the original context of Isaiah, (2) Mark’s use of Isaiah, and (3) the context of Mark.
Regarding the first area, it is true that the overall tone of Isaiah 6 and its previous context (Isa 1-5) is gloomy. In other words, the message of judgment is predominant. In light of this, it seems right to conclude that Isaiah 6:9-10 is to be interpreted as the message of judgment. However, this article argues that Isaiah’s original context itself includes the message of recovery and hope. For example, Isaiah 6:11-12 indicates that the judgment is temporary rather than permanent. Further, Isaiah 6:13 explicitly states that God leaves the holy seed even in the season of judgment. With regard to the second area, Mark uses Isaiah in the way of de-emphasizing the divine intention and initiative expressed in MT and LXX. MT uses imperative verbs, implying that God takes initiative in the hardening of people. MT also uses hiphil verbs that have causal meaning. This gives the impression that God is responsible for the hardening of people. The uses of future indicative verbs and divine passive verb in LXX have the same effect. However, Mark 4:12 mitigates divine intention in the hardening of people by using subjunctive mood and avoiding reinforced negation(μὴ. rather than οὐμὴ). Concerning the third area, both immediate context and larger context of Mark highlight audience’s response and reception. If ἵνα is to be interpreted as a purpose clause in the sense that Jesus’ use of parables intends to harden people’s heart, Mark 4:11-12 may not cohere with the general tone of the rest of the chapter. Putting all these pieces of evidence together, this article concludes that interpreting ἵνα in Mark 4:12 as a result clause makes far better sense.
Regarding the first area, it is true that the overall tone of Isaiah 6 and its previous context (Isa 1-5) is gloomy. In other words, the message of judgment is predominant. In light of this, it seems right to conclude that Isaiah 6:9-10 is to be interpreted as the message of judgment. However, this article argues that Isaiah’s original context itself includes the message of recovery and hope. For example, Isaiah 6:11-12 indicates that the judgment is temporary rather than permanent. Further, Isaiah 6:13 explicitly states that God leaves the holy seed even in the season of judgment. With regard to the second area, Mark uses Isaiah in the way of de-emphasizing the divine intention and initiative expressed in MT and LXX. MT uses imperative verbs, implying that God takes initiative in the hardening of people. MT also uses hiphil verbs that have causal meaning. This gives the impression that God is responsible for the hardening of people. The uses of future indicative verbs and divine passive verb in LXX have the same effect. However, Mark 4:12 mitigates divine intention in the hardening of people by using subjunctive mood and avoiding reinforced negation(μὴ. rather than οὐμὴ). Concerning the third area, both immediate context and larger context of Mark highlight audience’s response and reception. If ἵνα is to be interpreted as a purpose clause in the sense that Jesus’ use of parables intends to harden people’s heart, Mark 4:11-12 may not cohere with the general tone of the rest of the chapter. Putting all these pieces of evidence together, this article concludes that interpreting ἵνα in Mark 4:12 as a result clause makes far better sense.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 마가의 이사야 6:9-10 사용
3. 마가복음의 문맥
4. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
마가복음 4:12 번역 ― 비유의 목적인가, 결과인가? ―
성경원문연구
2022 .04
-
이사야 1-12장의 문맥 속에서 이사야 6장 읽기
구약논단
2019 .03
-
구약의 다른 본문들과의 비교를 통해서 보는 이사야 24장의 선교적 도전
복음과 선교
2023 .03
-
예수의 광야 기도와 축귀 병행 설교 - 이사야서를 배경으로 본 마가복음 1:29~39 -
신약연구
2015 .09
-
‘씨 뿌리는 자의 비유’의 구약 인용(막 4:12; 마 13:13; 눅 8:10) 변형과 신학적 의의
신약연구
2021 .01
-
누가복음 11:5-8의 한밤중의 세 친구 비유 이해 - ἀναίδεια의 이중적 기능
신약논단
2020 .09
-
A Farewell to Trito-Isaiah? : An Inner-Biblical Exegesis of Isaiah 54-57 in Light of Isaiah 1-2 and Psalm 1
Canon&Culture
2015 .04
-
이사야 6장의 문체 구조 분석 : 평행법 구조를 중심으로
성경원문연구
2018 .10
-
The Parable of the Soils and Mark’s Portrayal of the Disciples
TORCH TRINITY Journal
2022 .12
-
마가복음의 길 모티프의 문학적 기능과 신학적 의의와 이사야의 새 출애굽 반영
신약연구
2019 .01
-
이사야 56-66장에 나타난 거룩과 정의
구약논단
2017 .03
-
이사야 40-66장에 나타난 종의 교회론적 해석
신학지남
2017 .09
-
The Eschatological Blessing (בְּרָפָה) of the Spirit in Isaiah : with Special Reference to Isaiah 44:1-5
성경원문연구
2016 .10
-
제3 이사야의 안식일 신학 : 이사야 56장 1-8절과 58장 13-14절에 대한 주석적 연구
구약논단
2018 .06
-
The Korean Peninsula-US Relations from the Perspective of Isaiah’s Peace Discourse
Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology
2019 .12
-
비유 해석과 설교: 예수의 비유를 중심으로
복음과 실천신학
2015 .01
-
마가의 포도원 농부 비유 연구(마가복음 12:1-12)
피어선 신학 논단
2018 .08
-
칼빈의 이사야 주석에 나타나는 구속사적 해석: 사 61:1-3을 중심으로
구약논집
2018 .01
-
Comparing Rating Scale-Moderated Marking and Impression Marking: A Small Scale Study
Journal of Asia TEFL
2024 .09
-
요한복음의 이사야서 인용에 대한 상호텍스트성 연구
신약논단
2019 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
첫번째 댓글을 남겨주세요.