지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 147 - 177 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2022.9.95.147
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper describes how the Unified Purchase and Sale of Grain Policy has affected the grain trade in China’s rural areas. In general, it was broadly accepted that rural grain markets closed down after the government implemented the policy. However, it can be shown that, according to the regulations concerning the Unified Purchase and Sale of 1953, the State Grain Market existed at that point. Then, what is the State Grain Market and how is it different from well-known the Free Market of 1956 in rural areas?
The reason the State Grain Market has not been sufficiently dealt with academically is that the Unified Purchase and Sale Policy was initially recognized as a policy that operated contrary to the free market, leading researchers to focus on the mechanics of the Free Market that operated in 1956. Previous studies often explained the background and outcomes of the market policy without an accurate definition of the Free Market. As a result, it was easy to presume that there was no grain trade between individuals in rural areas except for smuggling after the Unified Purchase and Sale of Grain Policy.
However, rural areas have seen constant supply problems in the process of purchasing grain by the state. The cause of these issues was that the government overlooked the role of the grain trade in rural areas. Farmers often sold grain to use as funds for rural sideline production and, therefore, they had to repurchase grain afterward. Their economic activities were the basis for increasing farm income and the revitalization of the rural market. Moreover, the grain trade was a major part of rural trade. Once the grain trade was banned, the market system in rural areas collapsed, and the flow of goods between urban and rural areas was interrupted. However, the private grain trade among farmers made it difficult for the state to predict the amount of grain it could secure. Facing such a dilemma, the government felt it was forced to open the State Grain Market to solve the issue.
This paper examines in detail how the State Grain Market was operated in rural areas after the implementation of the Unified Purchase and Sale Policy. This study also discusses the difference between the State Grain Market and the Free Market of 1956, explaining the background, implementation, and limitations of the two distinct policies in order to show the specifics of what occurred in the rural areas as the Unified Purchase and Sale Policy developed. It will also demonstrate how the socialist ideals of China in the 1950s were embodied in the implementation of the socialist transformation policies, its problems, and the supplementary systems that caused further issues.
The reason the State Grain Market has not been sufficiently dealt with academically is that the Unified Purchase and Sale Policy was initially recognized as a policy that operated contrary to the free market, leading researchers to focus on the mechanics of the Free Market that operated in 1956. Previous studies often explained the background and outcomes of the market policy without an accurate definition of the Free Market. As a result, it was easy to presume that there was no grain trade between individuals in rural areas except for smuggling after the Unified Purchase and Sale of Grain Policy.
However, rural areas have seen constant supply problems in the process of purchasing grain by the state. The cause of these issues was that the government overlooked the role of the grain trade in rural areas. Farmers often sold grain to use as funds for rural sideline production and, therefore, they had to repurchase grain afterward. Their economic activities were the basis for increasing farm income and the revitalization of the rural market. Moreover, the grain trade was a major part of rural trade. Once the grain trade was banned, the market system in rural areas collapsed, and the flow of goods between urban and rural areas was interrupted. However, the private grain trade among farmers made it difficult for the state to predict the amount of grain it could secure. Facing such a dilemma, the government felt it was forced to open the State Grain Market to solve the issue.
This paper examines in detail how the State Grain Market was operated in rural areas after the implementation of the Unified Purchase and Sale Policy. This study also discusses the difference between the State Grain Market and the Free Market of 1956, explaining the background, implementation, and limitations of the two distinct policies in order to show the specifics of what occurred in the rural areas as the Unified Purchase and Sale Policy developed. It will also demonstrate how the socialist ideals of China in the 1950s were embodied in the implementation of the socialist transformation policies, its problems, and the supplementary systems that caused further issues.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. ‘統購統銷’ 후 농촌 문제와 국가식량시장
Ⅲ. 국가식량시장의 운영과 ‘三定’ 정책
Ⅳ. 자유시장 문제와 국가식량시장의 폐지
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중화인민공화국 건국 전후 식량 유통의 변화 ― 화베이 지역의 양곡 시장과 ‘牙行’의 변천을 중심으로 ―
동양사학연구
2021 .12
-
1950년대 식량 ‘통구통소(統購統銷)’의 시행과 제도화 과정 -허난성을 사례로-
중국근현대사연구
2024 .06
-
현대중국어 평가양상 범주 및 조동사 고찰
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
??原理?《??》疑??句??
중국학
2020 .01
-
1970・80年代の｢国際人｣論における日本人のアイデンティティ操作について－ レイベリング理論の枠組みを用いて －
일본어문학
2015 .01
-
치매조기검진제도에 대한 한 · 일 비교연구
일본문화연구
2018 .07
-
조선어 한자어접사의 형음의의 대응관계 연구
중국조선어문
2017 .05
-
모시는 글
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .11
-
会长致辞
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .11
-
1794년 전라도지역의 기근과 환곡의 활용
역사와실학
2016 .11
-
北魏時期 墓誌의 記述 방법과 門閥社會
중국고중세사연구
2019 .05
-
신체적 피해상황에서 본 사죄담화의 한일대조 -한일남녀대학생의 사용경향을 중심으로-
일본문화학보
2020 .05
-
隐性否定回应与趋异立场的构建：“有本事”负向语义偏移、语篇特点与互动功能
중어중문학
2023 .12
-
내가 개처럼 너를 좋아하고
자음과모음
2022 .09
-
고려-남송 외교 관계에서 商人의 역할
동서인문학
2016 .06
-
우뭇개 외 1편
시조시학
2022 .06
-
[개와 함께] “그 개, 안 물어요?”
유레카
2022 .03
-
아친개 외 1편
시조시학
2018 .06
-
명대 가정년간 해상세력의 형성과 분화 - 『일본일감』을 중심으로 -
역사와경계
2019 .12
-
고급한국어 듣기 말하기 수업에서의 ‘과정사정(课程思政)’적 교수설계와 실용 연구
중국조선어문
2021 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0