본 연구는 개인투자자들의 투자의사결정에 도움을 주고자, 증권신고서의 TF-IDF 텍스트 분석과 기계학습을 이용해 공모주의 상장 5거래일 이후 주식 가격 등락을 예측하는 모델을 제시한다. 연구 표본은 2009년 6월부터 2020년 12월 사이에 신규 상장된 691개의 국내 IPO 종목이다. 기업, 공모, 시장과 관련된 다양한 재무적 및 비재무적 IPO 관련 변수와 증권신고서의 어조를 분석하여 예측했고, 증권신고서의 어조 분석을 위해서 TF-IDF (Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency)에 기반한 텍스트 분석을 이용해 신고서의 투자위험요소란의 텍스트를 긍정적 어조, 중립적 어조, 부정적 어조로 분류하였다. 가격 등락 예측에는 로지스틱 회귀분석(Logistic Regression), 랜덤 포레스트(Random Forest), 서포트벡터 머신(Support Vector Machine), 인공신경망(Artificial Neural Network) 기법을 사용하였고, 예측 결과 IPO 관련 변수와 증권신고서 어조 변수를 함께 사용한 모델이 IPO 관련 변수만을 사용한 모델보다 높은 예측 정확도를 보였다. 랜덤 포레스트 모형은 1.45%p 높아진 예측 정확도를 보였으며, 인공신공망 모형과 서포트벡터머신 모형은 각각 4.34%p, 5.07%p 향상을 보였다. 추가적으로 모형간 차이를 맥니마 검정을 통해 통계적으로 검증한 결과, 어조 변수의 유무에 따른 예측 모형의 성과 차이가 유의확률 1% 수준에서 유의했다. 이를 통해, 증권신고서에 표현된 어조가 공모주의 가격 등락 예측에 영향을 미치는 요인이라는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.
There has been a growing interest in IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) due to the profitable returns that IPO stocks can offer to investors. However, IPOs can be speculative investments that may involve substantial risk as well because shares tend to be volatile, and the supply of IPO shares is often highly limited. Therefore, it is crucially important that IPO investors are well informed of the issuing firms and the market before deciding whether to invest or not. Unlike institutional investors, individual investors are at a disadvantage since there are few opportunities for individuals to obtain information on the IPOs. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to provide individual investors with the information they may consider when making an IPO investment decision. This study presents a model that uses machine learning and text analysis to predict whether an IPO stock price would move up or down after the first 5 trading days. Our sample includes 691 Korean IPOs from June 2009 to December 2020. The input variables for the prediction are three tone variables created from IPO prospectuses and quantitative variables that are either firm-specific, issue-specific, or market-specific. The three prospectus tone variables indicate the percentage of positive, neutral, and negative sentences in a prospectus, respectively. We considered only the sentences in the Risk Factors section of a prospectus for the tone analysis in this study. All sentences were classified into ‘positive’, ‘neutral’, and ‘negative’ via text analysis using TF-IDF (Term Frequency – Inverse Document Frequency). Measuring the tone of each sentence was conducted by machine learning instead of a lexicon-based approach due to the lack of sentiment dictionaries suitable for Korean text analysis in the context of finance. For this reason, the training set was created by randomly selecting 10% of the sentences from each prospectus, and the sentence classification task on the training set was performed after reading each sentence in person. Then, based on the training set, a Support Vector Machine model was utilized to predict the tone of sentences in the test set. Finally, the machine learning model calculated the percentages of positive, neutral, and negative sentences in each prospectus. To predict the price movement of an IPO stock, four different machine learning techniques were applied: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network. According to the results, models that use quantitative variables using technical analysis and prospectus tone variables together show higher accuracy than models that use only quantitative variables. More specifically, the prediction accuracy was improved by 1.45% points in the Random Forest model, 4.34% points in the Artificial Neural Network model, and 5.07% points in the Support Vector Machine model. After testing the performance of these machine learning techniques, the Artificial Neural Network model using both quantitative variables and prospectus tone variables was the model with the highest prediction accuracy rate, which was 61.59%. The results indicate that the tone of a prospectus is a significant factor in predicting the price movement of an IPO stock. In addition, the McNemar test was used to verify the statistically significant difference between the models. The model using only quantitative variables and the model using both the quantitative variables and the prospectus tone variables were compared, and it was confirmed that the predictive performance improved significantly at a 1% significance level.