지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 28 - 38 (11page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With rapid evolution and diverse success stories of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, AI solutions are being developed and introduced in a variety of industries. However, due to the multifaceted considerations of adopting AI solutions, many companies are still hesitant to apply them or stuck at the proof-of-concept level. As with previous results in various research fields, AI adoption governance can be broadly classified into two choices: make or buy. In detail, the self-development based only on the company’s own resources or buying solutions already developed by other companies.
AI solution adoption governance is closely related to Information System (IS) research fields because AI technologies are embedded in the Information Technology (IT) systems so that end users can easily use it. However, previous IS literatures are mainly focused on which benefit or how value can be created by adopting AI solutions and, as far as we know, do not particularly cover an AI solution adoption governance. This insufficient research trend is the main driver of this study. As multifaceted conflicting factors between costs and future capabilities need to be considered for companies looking to adopt AI solutions, transaction cost economies (TCE) and resource-based view (RBV) combined consideration is necessary. Even though a few IS research covers TCE and RBV combined decision making for innovation or outsourcing topic, but they treat only asset specificity as a major factor in TCE and recognize RBV is a more important decision-making factor. Besides IS fields, some papers simultaneously consider TCE and RBV, but they do not reflect AI solution related all factors.
In this study, we suggest seven attributes based on two fundamental theories showing significant attention from previous governance related research. In TCE, four factors (asset specificity, technological uncertainty, behavioral uncertainty, and frequency) are used. Specifically, operation cost is considered through frequency factor which was often ignored n previous TCE literatures. This is because AI technologies cannot learn on their own, transaction costs according to the learning frequency should be assessed when selecting governance. From RBV, three factors (possibility to gain competitive power, absorptive capacity, and appropriability hazard) are used; We include various capabilities and knowledge in the category of resources by referring to the initial RBV definition. Absorptive capacity refers to the extent to which employees have prior knowledge of AI technology. It is reported as a key resource to properly utilize AI solutions. Appropriability hazard, the risk of the company’s unique competitive resources being leaked to the outside, are another consideration because companies are not only interested in acquiring the resources they need, but also protecting their own valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN) resources.
We limit sample data only small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) because large companies can be applying various adoption governance due to their relatively better financial and slack resources. Through conjoint experiments, we are planning to analyze which factors are most significantly considered for SMEs and check how the characteristics of SMEs moderate the main effect. In addition, we consider two things to increase the reliability of the experiment. First, a survey will be conducted on CEOs who are practical decision makers of SMEs. Second, redundant profile design is used to check consistency of respondents’ answers.
This study is expected to contribute four aspects. First, it will identify significant factors affecting the AI solution adoption governance by synthesizing factors both related to the characteristics of the required resource adoption cost through TCE and each company’s idiosyncratic resource analysis through RBV. Second, the frequency factor overlooked in previous TCE literatures is used to determine governance selection. Third, we enrich the research on conjoint analysis, which also rarely used in the IS field. Lastly, this study analyzes the relationship between SMEs characteristics to AI adoption governance.
AI solution adoption governance is closely related to Information System (IS) research fields because AI technologies are embedded in the Information Technology (IT) systems so that end users can easily use it. However, previous IS literatures are mainly focused on which benefit or how value can be created by adopting AI solutions and, as far as we know, do not particularly cover an AI solution adoption governance. This insufficient research trend is the main driver of this study. As multifaceted conflicting factors between costs and future capabilities need to be considered for companies looking to adopt AI solutions, transaction cost economies (TCE) and resource-based view (RBV) combined consideration is necessary. Even though a few IS research covers TCE and RBV combined decision making for innovation or outsourcing topic, but they treat only asset specificity as a major factor in TCE and recognize RBV is a more important decision-making factor. Besides IS fields, some papers simultaneously consider TCE and RBV, but they do not reflect AI solution related all factors.
In this study, we suggest seven attributes based on two fundamental theories showing significant attention from previous governance related research. In TCE, four factors (asset specificity, technological uncertainty, behavioral uncertainty, and frequency) are used. Specifically, operation cost is considered through frequency factor which was often ignored n previous TCE literatures. This is because AI technologies cannot learn on their own, transaction costs according to the learning frequency should be assessed when selecting governance. From RBV, three factors (possibility to gain competitive power, absorptive capacity, and appropriability hazard) are used; We include various capabilities and knowledge in the category of resources by referring to the initial RBV definition. Absorptive capacity refers to the extent to which employees have prior knowledge of AI technology. It is reported as a key resource to properly utilize AI solutions. Appropriability hazard, the risk of the company’s unique competitive resources being leaked to the outside, are another consideration because companies are not only interested in acquiring the resources they need, but also protecting their own valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN) resources.
We limit sample data only small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) because large companies can be applying various adoption governance due to their relatively better financial and slack resources. Through conjoint experiments, we are planning to analyze which factors are most significantly considered for SMEs and check how the characteristics of SMEs moderate the main effect. In addition, we consider two things to increase the reliability of the experiment. First, a survey will be conducted on CEOs who are practical decision makers of SMEs. Second, redundant profile design is used to check consistency of respondents’ answers.
This study is expected to contribute four aspects. First, it will identify significant factors affecting the AI solution adoption governance by synthesizing factors both related to the characteristics of the required resource adoption cost through TCE and each company’s idiosyncratic resource analysis through RBV. Second, the frequency factor overlooked in previous TCE literatures is used to determine governance selection. Third, we enrich the research on conjoint analysis, which also rarely used in the IS field. Lastly, this study analyzes the relationship between SMEs characteristics to AI adoption governance.
목차
1. 서론
2. 관련 연구
3. 연구 모델
4. 데이터 및 분석방법
5. 참고 문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
엘리스그룹_“AI 교육 넘어 AI 솔루션 기업으로 확장한다”
전자기술
2024 .02
-
인공지능 분야 산업·기술 동향 및 이슈
[ETRI] 전자통신동향분석
2025 .02
-
2024 미국 대통령 선거_미국의 선택은 ‘어게인 트럼프’… AI에 끼칠 영향은?
전자기술
2024 .12
-
국내 건설분야 AI 활성화를 위한 실무자 인식에 관한 연구
한국산학기술학회 논문지
2023 .06
-
장애 학생들을 위한 인공 지능(AI) 교육 프로그램에서 고려할 사항 및 교육 프로그램 예시
한국정보통신학회 여성 ICT 학술대회 논문집
2020 .08
-
안전한 AI 서비스를 위한 국내 정책 및 가이드라인 개선방안 연구
정보보호학회논문지
2023 .12
-
AI교육플랫폼을 활용한 인공지능 수업의 방향
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2022 .05
-
국가 AI 경쟁력에 따른 OECD 국가 유형 분류: 퍼지셋 이상형 분석을 중심으로
정보화정책
2024 .06
-
AI 적용 체계 데이터 품질 점검 및 운용유지단계 모니터링 실증 연구
한국산학기술학회 논문지
2024 .08
-
국방분야 AI 적용 무기체계 도입을 위한 전순기 품질확보방안 연구
한국산학기술학회 논문지
2024 .08
-
Establishing a Five-Stages of AI Learning Based on Class Observation
International JOURNAL OF CONTENTS
2024 .06
-
AI와 IT 기술
전자공학회지
2022 .06
-
설계사무소의 업무 현황을 고려한 설계단계 AI 기술 활용 방안 기초 연구 - 이미지 및 텍스트 생성형 AI를 중심으로 -
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2024 .10
-
Large AI to Everywhere, 초거대AI 믿:음
정보과학회지
2023 .11
-
AI World 2022를 통해 살펴본 AI기술의 미래
전자공학회지
2022 .07
-
[AI TECH+ 2023] 참가기업이 선보인 AI 솔루션 확인하기
전자기술
2023 .10
-
글로벌 AI 지수로 본 한국 AI 산업_韓 AI, 62개국 중 6위… “인재 부족·투자 부진은 개선해야”
자동화기술
2023 .11
-
제조 지능화 AI 기술 - AI 도입은 더 이상 미룰 수 없는 숙명… 한 번에 해결보다는 AI 활용 과정이 중요
자동화기술
2024 .02
-
Analysis of the Current Status of the AI Major Curriculum at Universities Based on Standard of AI Curriculum
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2022 .03
-
AI가 바꾸는 산업들
미디어 이슈&트렌드
2023 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
급속 확산되는 물류현장의 로봇적용 사례
곽경민
,
박범
,
고은지
외 2명
로봇학회 논문지
2022
.12
라스트마일 딜리버리 서비스 품질과 의존성이 소매점의 지속적 이용의도에 미치는 영향
박민숙
경영교육연구
2022
.12
카카오의 비즈니스 생태계 사례 연구: 더 나은 세상을 위한 카카오의 가치 제안
박수현
,
김미리
,
김상유
Korea Business Review
2022
.11
무엇이 AI 프로젝트를 성공적으로 이끄는가?
김계숙
,
안현철
지능정보연구
2023
.03
위성통신산업 패러다임의 변화 및 시사점 - 저궤도 위성통신을 중심으로
김승민
월간 KIET 산업경제
2022
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-530-001514651