메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第38卷 第3號(通卷 第401號)
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
13 - 24 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Social mix has been adopted into residential developments, especially designating certain duty rates to construct rental units into an apartment complex by regulation. However, substantial consideration toward providing an inclusive or indiscriminative residential environment has been overlooked. This study aims to examine the influence of intensifying difference in terms of residential environment that is respectively applied to sales unit and rental units that are supplied in a single complex. Eighteen social-mix apartment complex cases were selected from two different mixed types of planning technique: (1) parcel-seperated type and (2) parcel-integrated type that accommodates sales and rental units for a comparative analysis. Multiple physical and morphological factors related to complex site planning were analyzed. The results show that the residential environment of rental housing was generally worse in the parcel-integrated type complexes than in the parcel-separated type. Regarding density, the building coverage ratio and the floor area ratio of the rental household area were higher in the parcel-separated type than in the parcel-integrated. The open space ratio(OSR) and livability space ratio(LSR) of rental household area were higher in the parcel-separated type complexes than in the parcel-integrated. Looking into by each complex type, the parcel-separated type complexes showed higher OSR, LSR, and RSR figures in the rental household area than in the sales household area. In parcel-integrated type complexes, all the indices except the RSR were lower in the rental household area than in the sales household area. While all the complexes of both the types had lower communal facility ratio(CFR) in the rental household area than in the sales household area, the gap between the two areas were higher in the parcel-integrated type complexes. Through this study, intensifying social mix is in urgent need of legal support that aims for an indiscriminative and inclusive physical condition.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적 고찰
3. 사회적 혼합단지의 주거환경 비교분석 방법론
4. 임대 및 분양주택 간 주거환경 비교분석
5. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-540-001061240