메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정원건 (국립농업과학원) 김경란 (국립농업과학원) 김효철 (국립농업과학원) 서민태 (국립농업과학원)
저널정보
대한인간공학회 대한인간공학회지 대한인간공학회지 제40권 제6호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
401 - 411 (11page)
DOI
10.5143/JESK.2021.40.6.401

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the cases of safety accident that occurred in Agricultural Product Processing Plants (APPPs), and the root cause and system of safety were analyzed by using logic tree diagraming method.
Background: Local rural development organizations have been expanding agricultural processing-related facilities by supporting related education and starts-ups in order to increase non-agricultural income and create jobs. However, since the machinery and equipment of agricultural processing plants use high-pressure, high-temperature, and high-speed rotation, workers are exposed to various risks. Since the number of safety accidents occurring at APPPs is increasing every year, it is necessary to manage and control the characteristics of accidents.
Method: The cases of 29 safety accidents that occurred in 10 APPPs were collected. Demographic characteristics and risk factors were investigated for 29 people who experienced accidents. In addition, logic tree diagraming method was conducted in order to analyze root causes and systems of safety.
Results: For the rate of 29 accidents by type of accident risk, high-temperature (41.4%) was identified as the highest rate, followed by excessive force/movement (20.7%), bump (13.8%), and jammed (6.9%). As for the type of injury, burns (48.3%) had the highest rate, followed by musculoskeletal disorders (20.7%), incised wound (10.3%), and cut (6.9%). Fracture, amputations, and stabbed were 3.4%, respectively. As results of logic tree diagraming method, 119 root causes were derived, which were classified into six categories in systems of safety. The most common system of safety was mitigation (28.6%), followed by design (23.5%), personal protective equipment (19.3%), training (17.6%), warning (9.2%), and communication (1.7%).
Conclusion: It was confirmed that the accident types in APPPs were similar to those in general industries, and it was determined that control and management of burn accidents were necessary. In addition, it is considered that measures such as installing protective devices, attaching warning signs, and wearing appropriate personal protective equipment are necessary to minimize the risk of APPPs.
Application: It is hoped that the results of this study will be utilized in the development of safety guidelines, checklist items, and manuals for the prevention of safety accidents for workers in APPPs.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0