메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
기도형 (계명대학교)
저널정보
대한인간공학회 대한인간공학회지 대한인간공학회지 제40권 제3호
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
139 - 147 (9page)
DOI
10.5143/JESK.2021.40.3.139

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: This study aimed to investigate backgrounds and limitations of personal punishment-oriented safety approach from an academic point of view and to propose its improvement measures.

Background: The complexity of socio-technical systems which are comprised of interacting human, technological and environmental components has ever-increased, which resulted in change in accident causation mechanism. Consequently, the traditional blame-oriented safety approach should be changed.

Method: This study was based on the literature survey, via a search of the ScienceDirect and Scopus using the keywords: accident causation model, accident investigation technique, and system safety.

Results: Backgrounds for blaming-oriented safety approach were summarized in viewpoint of the safety-I, domino theory and hindsight bias. The approach was necessary and helpful to learn from and prevent accidents or incidents in relatively simple systems of the past. Its limitations were revealed and presented from the perspective of the safety-II, domino theory, accident pyramids, characteristics of complex socio-technical systems, hindsight bias, and change of safety paradigm. This showed that the traditional approach would not prevent a recurrence of accidents in complex socio-technical systems, unless underlying causes across the systems were addressed.

Conclusion: Based on the results, it was suggested that to raise the level of safety, the safety approach should be shifted from traditional safety-I to safety-II.
Application: The results of this study will provide academic backgrounds for changing safety approach.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusions
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-530-001880427