지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제122호
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 25 - 65 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2021.12.122.25
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is the authority to command the military, which was practiced and preserved in the ancient Shilla dynasty. How this authority -which solely belonged to the King- was perceived and then executed, is the particular focus of this work.
The authority to command the military was of course an authority to deploy military assets, soldiers and resources alike. Therefore it was an authority that could not be shared in any event, and it was also never to be interfered with from exterior forces. Kim Yu-shin did not mind a conflict with So Jeong-bang of Dang over the issue of punishing Shilla soldiers, and when the Dang government offended Shilla by treating the Shilla King as more or less the same with yet another local lord of China, King Munmu dared changing the Shilla command structure to become identical with its Dang counterpart, so that he could declare his position and status as same with that of the Dang Emperor. The exclusiveness of this authority to command the military was also visualized by objects and protocols that symbolized the authority’s delegation and retrieval. The Weol that Kim Yu-shin was in possession of was a symbol of military command, just like the Jeongjeol of Dang or Jeoldo of ancient Japan. King Munmu’s visit to the ancestral mausoleum right after the fall of Goguryeo was also a ritual retrieving the delegated military command.
The authority to command the military was designed to control individuals within the command structure by punishments and rewards, but the authority itself was also never arbitrarily wielded. The commander of the Shilla military officialized wartime rules of punishment and reward as well as its resolve to abide by such rules, by issuing Seo declarations. Such rules had to be observed and followed by all parties, regardless of their ranks, including the commander himself. As following orders was crucial in military operations, and one could only pay the ultimate price with one’s own life, the spectrum of the punishments was rather narrow. The commander was granted with a certain range of discretion in rewarding soldiers under his command, but predetermined procedures had to be followed as well. From records of Shilla rewarding meritorious deeds right after the fall of Goguryeo , or from relevant regulations of Dang and Japan, we can see that Shilla was equipped with a system to reward meritorious actions performed in the time of war.
The authority to command the military was of course an authority to deploy military assets, soldiers and resources alike. Therefore it was an authority that could not be shared in any event, and it was also never to be interfered with from exterior forces. Kim Yu-shin did not mind a conflict with So Jeong-bang of Dang over the issue of punishing Shilla soldiers, and when the Dang government offended Shilla by treating the Shilla King as more or less the same with yet another local lord of China, King Munmu dared changing the Shilla command structure to become identical with its Dang counterpart, so that he could declare his position and status as same with that of the Dang Emperor. The exclusiveness of this authority to command the military was also visualized by objects and protocols that symbolized the authority’s delegation and retrieval. The Weol that Kim Yu-shin was in possession of was a symbol of military command, just like the Jeongjeol of Dang or Jeoldo of ancient Japan. King Munmu’s visit to the ancestral mausoleum right after the fall of Goguryeo was also a ritual retrieving the delegated military command.
The authority to command the military was designed to control individuals within the command structure by punishments and rewards, but the authority itself was also never arbitrarily wielded. The commander of the Shilla military officialized wartime rules of punishment and reward as well as its resolve to abide by such rules, by issuing Seo declarations. Such rules had to be observed and followed by all parties, regardless of their ranks, including the commander himself. As following orders was crucial in military operations, and one could only pay the ultimate price with one’s own life, the spectrum of the punishments was rather narrow. The commander was granted with a certain range of discretion in rewarding soldiers under his command, but predetermined procedures had to be followed as well. From records of Shilla rewarding meritorious deeds right after the fall of Goguryeo , or from relevant regulations of Dang and Japan, we can see that Shilla was equipped with a system to reward meritorious actions performed in the time of war.
목차
머리말
1. 군령권의 성격과 시각화
2. 군령권의 집행 방식
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
박정희 대통령시기(1968~1972) 자주국방 측면에서 바라본 통합군 추진의 배경과 과정
군사연구
2016 .01
-
6~7세기 초 新羅 전공포상의 제도화와 정치적 함의
신라사학보
2021 .08
-
9세기 나당관계와 재당신라인 사회
역사와경계
2020 .06
-
『계원필경집』을 통해 본 최치원의 귀국 항로 - 『입당구법순례행기』의 엔닌 귀국 항로와 비교 분석을 중심으로 -
신라사학보
2024 .12
-
신라사에서의 전제정치론과 왕권
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
군사통번역의 특성과 군통번역사의 자질
통역과 번역
2024 .04
-
신라 ‘삼국통일’ 논쟁의 논점과 방향
역사비평
2019 .11
-
The C-command Condition and Its Acquisition
영어영문학연구
2020 .01
-
고구려 軍事儀禮 연구를 위한 提言
신라사학보
2024 .12
-
일본 시코쿠(四国)지역의고대한국계 신사(사원)와 전승
日本學硏究
2015 .01
-
Is c-command Machine-learnable?
언어학
2021 .01
-
미얀마 군부 지배의 역사적 고찰 - 그 정치 동력의 구조
역사비평
2021 .08
-
United States-United Nations Relations in the Korean War: Focusing on the Conflict over Aid Operations and War Expenses
Korea Journal
2020 .06
-
군부 권위주의로 회귀하는 미얀마 - 민간-군부관계로 본 쿠데타의 역동성 -
역사교육
2022 .03
-
군대에 묶인 대학생의 몸 — 1969~1971년 대학 교련과 교련 반대운동 —
사림
2024 .01
-
연남생 투항 이후 고구려 서북부 성곽방어체계의 붕괴과정과 그 영향
역사와현실
2021 .12
-
“사랑하라”는 명령은 성립가능한가?
인간·환경·미래
2021 .10
-
신라 하대 '金憲昌 의 亂'에 대한 연구 현황과 과제
군사연구
2018 .01
-
On the Applications of Computer-Assisted Language Learning in a Military English Context
영어영문학
2017 .05
-
한국군(軍)의 통역자원 운용에 관한 연구: 미국과 독일 사례와의 비교를 중심으로
번역학연구
2022 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0