지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years, the illegal Trademark Counterfeiting and counterfeit trademark goods have become a global issue. A so-called 'dead-copy goods',those are the infringements of the Trademark laws. In response, recently the major developed countries are pushing to 'Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (the following is a short designation, 'ACTA').
But now, we aren't prepare to conditions that demands from ACTA's standards, so our Trademark Law's criminal punishments and procedures have to change. At least in case of willful trademark counterfeiting on 'a commercial scale' should be applied to the criminal procedures and penalties.
For the answer to that, first of all, we have to divide between 'the general Trademark' and 'the serious infringements'. The serious infringements means that intentional counterfeiting on a commercial scale.
A commercial scale's meaning in public is that a for-profit or business act working systematic and on a large scale. Therefore, it is mainly required to define 'the serious trademark infringements' distinguishing from the general infringements including that 'a commercial scale', that is 'for-profit' and 'business of systematic and grand-scale'. Also to add to this, a matter of the distribution of counterfeit trademark goods might to be make a rule that include many type of after-attends acts to the trademark counterfeiting.
Therefore, we have to make a regulation on the ground of the principle of "nulla poena, nullum crimen sine lege" for definiteness and propriety of legality.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0