메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김동준 (충남대학교)
저널정보
경북대학교 IT와 법 연구소 IT와 법연구 IT와 법연구 제12호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
83 - 120 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to the Article 35 of the Patent Act of Korea, a subsequent application filed by the legitimate owner of the right to a patent (i.e. replacement application) shall be deemed to have been filed at the time the invalidated patent application was filed (hereinafter "Article 35 remedy"). However, it has been uncertain whether the transfer of the patent is available as another remedy for the legitimate owner of the right because there has been no Supreme Court case law to clarify this legal issue. As a result, some commentators argued that it is available and other commentators argued that it is not available. Recent two Supreme Court Decisions held differently. On the one hand, 2012Da11310 held that even if a patent has been granted to the usurped application the legitimate owner of the right to the patent cannot claim the transfer of the patent because he has the remedy under the Article 35 of the Patent Act. On the other hand, 2011Da77313, 77320 held that the transfer of the patent is available as long as both the patent and the right to the patent is about the same invention if the legitimate owner (assignor) assigned the right to a patent to a third party ( assignee), the assignee acquired a patent thereafter, and the assignment is invalid. It seems to be that whether the transfer of patent is available as a remedy depends on the circumstances of the case. After the 2012Da11310 decision, the National Assembly of Korea is currently considering a proposed amendment to the Patent Act that would provide the transfer of patent as a remedy for the legitimate owner of the right to a patent (Actually, after this article has been submitted for peer review, the bill has been passed on Feb. 4th, 2016). This article considers three questions regarding the proposed amendment. First of all, the proposed amendment which provides both the old remedy (i.e. Article 35 remedy) and the new remedy (i.e. the transfer of patent) for the legitimate owner of the right would make sense at least for the time being. However, we need to review whether the old remedy is still necessary or not in addition to the new remedy in the near future. Next, the proposed amendment which places no time limit for the transfer of patent would not be problematic since it includes third-party protection devices. Finally, the need to remove the time bar (i.e. two years from the grant of the patent) for the old remedy is not that great although there exists little concern for the abuse of the remedy. With the broadening of the claims by the legitimate owner under the Article 35, the interests of third parties would be harmed. We need to continue to review this. It is the most important thing to balance between providing relief for the legitimate owner and protecting the interests of third parties when we consider remedies for the legitimate owner against usurped patents or usurped patent applications. This is what we have to watch out for.
#Usurped Patent Application #Usurped Patent #Replacement Application #Transfer of Patent #Legitimate Owner of the Right

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0