지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)
2021
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article attempts to bridge a pluralist notion of justice and the concept of equity through an investigation of the meaning of the phrase ‘fair and equitable’ found in various fields of international law. Under the premise that justice is achieved by combining law and equity, this article explores six notions of justice and the meanings, principles, and contents of equity, arguing that justice must reflect the principles and contents of equity. The aim is to determine i) whether the Nagoya Protocol pursues these notions of justice according to the characteristics of equity, and if not, ii) what kind of solution can be suggested to improve current inequity. By examining relevant articles of the Protocol, this study finds that the Protocol addresses distributive and procedural aspects of equity in a limited way and consideration of context is neglected. Given that the discussion on achievement of ‘fair and equitable’ benefit-sharing is still ongoing in various international fora, and that the Protocol shall be implemented in a mutually supportive manner with those international instruments, it is suggested that the contextual aspect of equity regarding the phrase ‘fair and equitable’ benefit-sharing be taken into account in fora and the relevant international instruments negotiations in order to pursue a multiple and balanced approach in the application of ‘fair and equitable’ sharing of benefits prescribed in the Protocol.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0