메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이국화 (창원대학교)
저널정보
대한정치학회 대한정치학회보 대한정치학회보 제26권 제3호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
151 - 175 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The frequency of global environmental crisis and the deepening of the global environmental cooperation, drives the global environmental governance from scratch, participating countries from a few to several, participating way from passive to active, and also driving the global environmental governance presenting the characteristics such as unconventionality, self-consciousness, unboundedness, contradictoriness and multidimensionality. Because there are cooperation and competition, consensus of global environmental improvement and individual differences, lack of supervision and poor coordination among different countries, so the global environmental governance is in contradictions and dilemmas. In the future global environmental governance system, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”, to give full play of power mechanism, market mechanism and social mechanism, advocate inclusive concept, and to encourage various participation, so that we can achieve the goals of the global environmental governance. Through process tracing method,the paper analyzes how the environmental objectives become a pillar of‘the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’as equally important as social and economic goals. From the perspective of global governance, the importance of the environment in the global development agenda is increasing. Environmental issues in ‘the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’will be of great importance in global and China’s environmental governance. The global implications for future environmental governance are mainly reflected in: first,the importance of environmental governance will be significantly increased; second,new partnership will strengthen the roles of environmental NGOs and civil society; third, to achieve environmental goals, governance system will increasingly depend on data-driven reviews; fourth, the role of environmental institutions within the UN system will be further strengthened, esp. the UNEP; fifth, environmental along with climate change financing and technology transfer may be further diversified; sixth,climate change and other environmental issues at the global and national levels will be more integrated. Meanwhile,implications on China are: first, it will offer China’s economic transformation and sustainable development a powerful new force; second, China will significantly enhance its public environmental awareness; third, China will play a key role in global governance with a unique focus; fourth, it will require better environmental management system and capacity of China; fifth, China’s future regional cooperation will be greener. However, in the new norms of the economic situation, these environmental goals increase the pressure and responsibility for China’s governance. At the same time,there are also a series of problems and shortcomings in the 2030 Agenda: First, the targets are too many, vague, and difficult to implement. Second, there may be some conflicting targets in the agenda. Third, environmental goals are lack of quantitative standards. Undoubtedly, the environmental objectives in‘the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’are more integrated, comprehensive and systematic than the Millennium Development Goals, demonstrating international community’s collective efforts to address environmental issues. Therefore, we must attach great importance to observe and research.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0