메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
안경환 (서울대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제31권 제2호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
1 - 22 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay is a wide-scope observation on the human rights issues in Korea as of 2020. To feature a panoramic view of the landscape, the author combines academic theories with relevant field reports. He opens the paper by citing Bartleby, the Scrivener(by Herman Melville), to put the perception of alienation as the prime cause of human rights problems in a global capitalistic society like Korea. On the level of constitutional value, harmonic balance between liberty and equality are emphasized. Considering that Korea has subatantially established herself as a free and democratic society, the author argues that, from now on, Economic and Social Rights should be more jeolously promoted. The author emphasizes ,in that line, that government policies and judiciary dicisions should be more geared toward futuristic approaches on evolving standards. Ideological battles between the two Koreas that haunted their people for the last 70 years can be ameliorated only by making (South) Korea a more egalitarian society. Added to various existing categories of underprivileged classes, new immigrants may be singled out as the category worthy of attention. Protecting and promoting the rights of their rights emeges as the most pivotal task in preventing danger of mass producing of the second-class citizens in Korea, which has taken an irrevocable, rapid journey toward a multi-cultural society. Throughout the entire paper, the author cites many classical literary works dealing with pertinent human rights issues. A Tale of Two Cities (Charles Dickens) Animal Farm(George Orwell) and La Peste (Albert Camus) are some examples. As a closing passage, the author emphasizes that the juristic inertia limiting human rights discourses within pure legal framework should readily be abandoned.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0