메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김훈주 (법무부)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제31권 제1호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
179 - 208 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The granting of Legal Personhood to AI has been triggered by a European Parliament resolution and is being discussed in many countries around the world. The granting of Legal Personhood to AI is can be a big challenge to existing principle that the subject of rights recognized only persons and juristic person, and the impact of this change should be considered from various perspectives. In this paper, we looked at whether it is necessary to grant Legal Personhood to AI and how to deal with the related problems if it is given the legal status. At the current level of technology as weak AI, the legal status need not be changed significantly, but at the level of technology as strong AI or superAI it was necessary to consider whether it should be reviewed for its legal status. Based on the current law, some problems were solved by using 'Manufacturing Responsibility', 'Owner Responsibility of Animals', 'Owner or Occupant Responsibility of manufactured goods', even if AI was not granted for its new legal status. AI's characteristics of "Autonomy" and "Unforeseeability" are also carried out within a certain range, and it was difficult to regard it as an absolute root or factor in granting of Legal Personhood to AI. However, it is impossible to resolve all legal issues related to AI through existing laws and it is also possible to grant Legal Personhood to AI in consideration of international trends. Issues related to grant of Legal Personhood to AI were divided into "① AI's capacity of rights,② AI's capacity to commit an unlawful act, ③ AI's registration, ④ AI's personal rights and ⑤ AI's extinction". AI's capacity of rights need to be defined in accordance with the purpose of use and the provisions of the law, and that it can also be given the capacity to act within the scope of its capacity of rights. AI can also act on its own without intervention or assistance from persons, unlike juristic person, so it can recognize its capacity to commit an unlawful act unless there are special circumstances. However, more discussion is needed on whether AI should bear all the damages it inflicts on others, or whether owners or manufacturers should distribute responsibility appropriately. In addition, there is a need to establish an insurance or fund system to ensure the fulfillment of AI's liability for damages, and the calculation of insurance premiums need to be applied differently depending on the degree of AI's risk. Registration and Extinction of AI are difficult to deal with like juristic person and require much consideration in terms of method and effectiveness. In addition, it is difficult to recognize AI's personal rights Due to the remarkable pace of technological development, co- existence between people and AI has become a topic of conversation, and even legalization of AI is being discussed. Although it is recognized that there is a need to grant the Legal Personhood to AI, it is examined a relation between existing legal system and the social impact and effects due to its change, and I think we need to continue to study related issues.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0