메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정태호 (경기대학교) 윤여강 (경기대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 과학기술과 법 과학기술과 법 제10권 제1호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
123 - 164 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Most of research on the patent litigation system is concentrated to China and Japan and there is lack to the research of Taiwan 's system. Taiwan started Intellectual Property Court from 2008, late than Korean Patent Court which was established in 1998. However, in the scope of the jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of Taiwan’s intellectual property court include first instance and second instance of civil action for the protection of intellectual property rights and interest under the Patent Act, Trademark Act, Copyright Act, Optical Disk Act, Trade Secrets Act, Regulations Governing the Protection of Integrated Circuits Configuration, Species of Plants and Seeding Act, and Fair Trade Act, showing more advanced aspect than Korea. Therefore, we have studied Taiwanese patent litigation system to find some useful suggestions for the patent litigation system of our country. The Taiwan Intellectual Property Court has preferential jurisdiction for civil and administrative lawsuits of patent and can treat in a way of “a combination of three trials in one” to civil, criminal and administrative lawsuits of intellectual property rights cases except for patent infringement cases so that it is could maintain consistency in the rulings. Also, technical examination officers who assist judges to technical problem participates from the first instance to enhance the technical understanding of the judge, so that speedy resolution of trial can be made. However, the Intellectual Property Court is not final court of intellectual property cases. In civil and criminal action, the Supreme Court is the final court, and administrative action is finally decided by Supreme Administrative Court. Thus, there is still a problem that the rulings of between Supreme Court and Supreme Administrative Court are not coincide on the same case of litigation. In Taiwan, for appealing a refusal to grant a patent by patent office or invalidation case, one should bring to the case to Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (“TIPO”) first. If one wants appeal to the decision of TIPO, this is then appealed to the Petitions and Appeals Committee (“PAC”) of the Ministry of Economic Affairs (“MOEA”). If one wants to appeal further to the decision of PAC, then can appeal as an administrative litigation to the Intellectual Property Court. Thus, there are two review stages (TIPO, PAC) in administrative stage. In a procedure of Intellectual Property Court, defendant is MOEA who has PAC which decided the petition, and Plaintiff is a patent applicant, or a petitioner of invalidation or a patentee. In Taiwan, invalidation litigation is regarded as an administrative litigation, only administrative office is a defendant, which is different from Korea where the parties in administrative litigation is the same parties who filed invalidation procedure for ensuring their right of pleading. However, this problem is supplemented by allowing the party of invalidation procedure to participate to the administrative litigation as an intervener in Taiwan Taiwan does not have a criminal penalty for infringement of patent right, and there is only civil remedy procedure for patent rights. Criminal cases related to intellectual property rights, such as trademarks and copyrights etc. (except patent rights) are subject to a first instance by each district court. The first court ruling of the criminal case of the district court is appealed to Intellectual Property Court as a second instance except for the juvenile criminal case. In Korea, there is difficulty to consistent judgements on civil, criminal and administrative case of patent infringement because criminal case is not exclusive jurisdiction for the Patent Court. In order to solve these problems, Taiwanese patent litigation system can be good reference to consider.
#대만 #지혜재산법원 #3심합일 #우선관할 #특허소송제도

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청
특허청 / 2017 / 우리기업 해외진출을 위한 해외지식재산권보호 가이드북 : 대만 편 / 진한엠앤비 google schola 특허청 산업재산보호정책과 / 2014 / 해외지식재산권 보호가이드북(대만) / 특허청·한국지식재산보호협회 google schola 특허심판원 / 2017 / 특허심판과 침해소송의 비교연구 dbpia 정차호 / 2012 / 대한민국 지식재산전문법원의 사물관할 / 법제연구 (43):495~537 google schola 정차호 / 2016 / 특허소송의 관할집중: ‘특허권에 관한’ 사건인지 여부의 판단 / 성균관법학 28(4):193~236 Crossref

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0