지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.1
- 수록면
- 5 - 22 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Securing the right to enrich is, in essence, a necessary proposition as a sovereign state. While there are no current international laws prohibiting uranium enrichment and reprocessing for peaceful purposes, the United States strictly bans enrichment and reprocessing through the bilateral nuclear agreement. As the majority of South Korea’s prominent politicians and the vast majority of South Korean nuclear experts believe that a nuclear bomb would in the long term be a threat to their national interests, South Korea has ever maintained its stance that the 1992 denuclearization joint statement with North Korea, in addition to the nuclear cooperation pact with the United States remains valid. South Korea acknowledges that possession of nuclear weapons would provide only a short-term regional advantage that would turn into a longer-term vulnerability, because sooner or later, Japan, which many nuclear pundits claim is on the threshold of a de-facto nuclear-armed state in many respects, would follow suit and a regional nuclear arms race would be inescapable. The technical choices South Korea has made in the configuration of the nuclear program demonstrate a strong preference for a robust enrichment capability rather than for a rapid nuclear weapons breakout capability. Given that South Korea’s development program is focused on next-generation technology in terms of nuclear export, it is time to consider how to obtain the right to enrich, including the possibility of nullifying the dead-on-arrival 1992 denuclearization declaration.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일반적 핵대응 포트폴리오에 의한 한국의 북핵 대응사례 평가
국제정치연구
2018 .06
-
북한 핵문제의 고찰과 전술핵 배치에 대한 연구
대한정치학회보
2017 .01
-
American Responses to Possible South Korean Nuclear Weapon Development: Then and Now
Journal of Peace and Unification
2023 .05
-
The P5's Nuclear Pursuit and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) at Challenge
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2023 .06
-
북한 핵능력 변쳔과 대외정책의 상관관계에 대한 연구
Journal of North Korea Studies
2018 .01
-
일본의 탈원전 정책 전개 과정 및 법제화에 관한 연구
경제규제와 법
2019 .05
-
Challenges and Opportunities Facing Middle-Power Nonproliferation Overachieverss: The Republics of Kazakhstan and Korea
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2022 .12
-
Recent Controversies over Nuclear Strategy of Nuclear States
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .12
-
North Korea’s Growing Nuclear Threat: Implications for the U.S. Extended Deterrence in the East Asian Region
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2017 .01
-
핵폐기 사례의 분석과 북핵 문제에 대한 함의
한국군사학논집
2018 .10
-
북한 핵증강론의 담론적 기원과 당론화 과정
국제정치논총
2017 .03
-
North Korea Can Never Be a ‘Nuclear Weapon State.
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .08
-
Designating North Korean Nuclear Weapons as Proliferation Risks: A Proposal for Forestalling Major Power Conflict in the Event of North Korea’s Internal Collapse
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .03
-
South Korea’s Defense Posture against the North Korean Nuclear Threat: Dangerous Reluctance
Asian International Studies Review
2015 .01
-
North Korea’s Nuclear Reality, South Korea’s Arms Anxiety
Global Asia
2018 .03
-
북핵문제와 한국의 대응 : 북핵 확산을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2016 .06
-
Coming to Terms with North Korea’s Nuclear Strength
Global Asia
2023 .03
-
South Korean Preparedness for the North Korean Nuclear Threat: A Few Steps Behind
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .06
-
한미 원자력 협력: 원자력 이용개발 협력 이슈와 쟁점
국가전략
2019 .01
-
원자력발전소시설의 전주기적인 물리적방호 규제체계 정립을 위한 법제개선 방안
法學論文集
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0