메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
유지성 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국비교정부학회 한국비교정부학보 한국비교정부학보 제25권 제2호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
253 - 279 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
(Purpose) Deliberative democracy allows citizens to participate in informed discussions to build consensus leading to conflict resolution and/or optimal policymaking, thereby ensuring a more democratic system. This paper presents an overview of deliberative decision-making for energy policy, focusing on the impact of participants’ trust in information sources. (Design/methodology/approach) Examined in this study is the 2017 public deliberation in Korea tasked with deciding whether to resume or discontinue construction of two Shin-Gori nuclear reactors. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the results of four surveys conducted over the course of the deliberation process with the purpose of investigating the impact of trust in information providers on participants’ opinions and final decisions. (Findings) The results indicated that participants who trusted information from nuclear experts and nuclear power operators tended to support resumption of reactor construction, while those who trusted information from government, civic groups, and Internet sources tended to support suspension of construction. (Research implications or Originality) Implication for energy policymakers is that sound, safe, reliable nuclear energy policy enacted with the support of citizens can be achieved through designing an effective process of providing reliable information on all sides of the policy issue and engaging an informed representative group of citizens in decision making.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0