메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송시열 (경남대학교) 최옥진 (경남대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제30권 제4호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
897 - 906 (10page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2021.8.30.4.897

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aimed to compare and analyze international men"s professional squash players" games played on courts with two different characteristics-those with walls made of plaster and those with walls made of glass. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, the world"s top 50 men"s professional squash matches were the subject of study, which were played either on plaster courts or glass courts in the Allam British Open and El Gouna International Squash Open in 2019 and CIB Egyptian Open in 2020. 162 sets of 43 games on plaster courts and 184 sets of 48 games on glass courts were analyzed. In data processing, a χ² test and an independent sample t-test was conducted using the SPSS/PC Window V23.0 program for the comparative analysis of the skill and technique attempt rates, scoring types and scoring areas etc. As a result of this analysis, the results were concluded as follows:
First, the skill and technique attempt rates were found to show the same order of probability for both plaster and glass courts; the drive shot showed the highest attempt rate, followed by the volley, drop, service, volley drop, boast, lob, and volley boast shots.
Second, the technical success was generally the highest, followed by the opponent"s mistake and the referee"s decision.
Third, the scoring areas were found to have the same order of probability for both plaster and glass courts; the C area was the highest followed by the D, A, B, E and F areas.
Fourth, the rallying frequency for the plaster courts (average of 15.96) was found to be higher than that for the glass courts (average of 14.37).

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0