메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이현주 (인천대학교)
저널정보
한국사전학회 한국사전학 한국사전학 제37호
발행연도
2021.5
수록면
7 - 51 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The problematic of public language in Korea -which, in fact, is a notion that appeared properly in a Korean institutional context- consists of four fundamental questions. First of all, the notion of public language is not sufficiently addressed in a theoretical point of view, in the sense that the various definitions made in many articles or in dictionaries are operational definitions based mainly on their speakers(the public sectors), and their interlocutors(the public). Second, the language movement widely known as the Plain English Campaign is misunderstood because the word plain is translated to “easy” in Korean. Third, the standardization of terminology dealt with either by the National Institute of the Korean Language and the Terminology Commissions located in each ministry, poses problems by confusing the specialized terms and administrative expressions or words -gibberish, rare and heavy words- which weigh down the text. Finally, by substituting sepcialized terms for easier "vulgar" terms, we not only risk getting lost in the misunderstanding but also creating a third language that neither the public nor experts use.
Public language has to be considered as a complex writing that includes two different language registers, that of experts and citizens who use everyday language. After investigating English devices and French legal measures which aim at the duty of clear and understandable administrative language, we are led to conclude that the terminology and administrative expressions must be treated separately, the first by providing the definition precise and accessible to the public, and the second by proposing simple and clear words or reformulations.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 문제 제기
3. 공공언어의 개념과 특징에 대하여
4. 공공언어 유형화의 문제
5. 나오며: 계속되는 문제 제기
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (50)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-703-001855427