지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article mainly examines the theory of calamity as a warning signal during the Tang and Song period of Chinese history. Through carrying out the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志), in particular, this research shows us that there were significant changes in their perspectives on the conventional correlative cosmology. The Chinese people of the Tang Dynasty, who built up the great cosmopolitan empire, had come to interpret the phenomena of nature like the natural disasters from a new angle. Since the Dong Zhongshu(董仲舒) of the Han Dynasty compiled all the different ideas about the ancient correlative cosmologies like the theory of Yin and Yang and theory of the Five Elements(五行) into a systematic and powerful theory, there had been no noticeable change in the Chinese perspective on nature until the Tang Chinese came to have different view on it.
The opinions of the Tang court officials like Yu Zhining(于志寧) and Cen Wenben(岑文本) on the natural disasters which had occurred during the early period of Tang Dynasty, in particular, exemplified their new and changed view on nature. They argued that natural disasters did not necessarily result from the sovereign’s failures in his rule, which were distinctly different from the Dong Zhongshu’s ideas. On the other hand, other court officials of roughly the same period like Yu Wenjun(俞文俊) and Song Wuguang(宋務光) suggested significantly different comments on the natural disasters. From their perspectives, the natural calamities like the flooding happened because the sovereignty of the Empress Dowager Wu(武則天) and the Empress Dowager Wei(韋后) lacked the legitimacy. Even though their ideas had similar aspects with the Dong Zhongshu’s, their opinion also had considerable differences from the schematic model of correlative cosmology. They just tried to oppose the rule of the female sovereigns. To sum up, the early Tang elites were relatively free from the ancient theory of calamity as a warning signal(災異論) and suggested diverse approaches to the interpretation of the natural disorders.
Consequently, the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and the Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) shows us that the Tang and Song Chinese began to depart from the conventional understanding of the universe and take quite different views of it.
The opinions of the Tang court officials like Yu Zhining(于志寧) and Cen Wenben(岑文本) on the natural disasters which had occurred during the early period of Tang Dynasty, in particular, exemplified their new and changed view on nature. They argued that natural disasters did not necessarily result from the sovereign’s failures in his rule, which were distinctly different from the Dong Zhongshu’s ideas. On the other hand, other court officials of roughly the same period like Yu Wenjun(俞文俊) and Song Wuguang(宋務光) suggested significantly different comments on the natural disasters. From their perspectives, the natural calamities like the flooding happened because the sovereignty of the Empress Dowager Wu(武則天) and the Empress Dowager Wei(韋后) lacked the legitimacy. Even though their ideas had similar aspects with the Dong Zhongshu’s, their opinion also had considerable differences from the schematic model of correlative cosmology. They just tried to oppose the rule of the female sovereigns. To sum up, the early Tang elites were relatively free from the ancient theory of calamity as a warning signal(災異論) and suggested diverse approaches to the interpretation of the natural disorders.
Consequently, the comparative analysis between the Jiutangshu(舊唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) and the Xintangshu(新唐書) Wuxingzhi(五行志) shows us that the Tang and Song Chinese began to depart from the conventional understanding of the universe and take quite different views of it.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 唐代 相關的 宇宙論에 대한 비판 담론의 형성
Ⅲ. 『舊唐書』「五行志」 및 『新唐書』「五行志」를 통해 본 재이현상에 대한 새로운 인식
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『구당서』 · 『신당서』 등에 보이는 ‘反’ 용례 비교 검토 : 신라사의 반란 용례와도 관련하여
중국고중세사연구
2017 .11
-
传统时期在中国出版的韩国人编着书籍总览
한중인문학포럼 발표논문집
2015 .10
-
월암(月巖) 최일하(崔一河)의 삶과 의식세계 - 은둔관(隱遁觀)을 중심으로 -
한성어문학
2017 .08
-
≪碧鷄漫志≫譯註(3)
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
≪碧鷄漫志≫譯註(4)
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
『南齊書』 「五行志」의 구조와 특징 ― 時令과 災異說의 결합 ―
중국고중세사연구
2022 .02
-
文?作品句子?面??模糊性及其???究－以≪唐?三百首≫?例－
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
『續漢書』 「五行志」 序의 구조와 劉昭注의 특징
중국고중세사연구
2020 .02
-
최치원의 사행과 재입당 시점 재고 - ｢旅遊唐城贈先王樂官｣의 분석을 중심으로-
사학연구
2021 .09
-
슴베찌르개와 한⋅일 찌르개문화
한국구석기학보
2019 .01
-
『宋書』「五行志」와 『搜神記』에 투영된 孫吳 인식 - 南朝化의 端緖 -
중국고중세사연구
2021 .05
-
技能을 넘어선 神妙함 - 『舊唐書』 「方伎傳」 譯註 -
중국고중세사연구
2019 .08
-
唐 前·後期 羅唐戰爭 서술과 인식 : 『唐會要』와 『通典』의 분석을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2017 .06
-
조선어교과서의 어휘 번역에 대한 소고 - 고중 《생물》교과서를 중심으로
중국조선어문
2020 .03
-
韩国诗话中的唐诗優劣论
중국어문논총
2024 .07
-
新羅末賓貢諸子的唐詩接受
연민학지
2024 .02
-
中国语教育课程与教科书比较研究
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2020 .11
-
不動心 획득을 위한 孟子의 심리적 메커니즘에 관한 고찰 - 『孟子』「浩然之氣章」의 용기에 대한 논의를 중심으로
동양철학
2021 .01
-
『後漢書』「五行志」譯註 Ⅶ
중국고중세사연구
2021 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-912-001855326