메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
임정현 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제46권 제2호
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
529 - 546 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of the present study is to examine how L2 learners interpret locally ambiguous ‘garden-path’ sentences, and whether and in what way different reading tasks affect the comprehension of such garden-path sentences. Using an offline experiment, participants were given two types of reading conditions. In one condition, they were asked to read sentences and answer comprehension questions, while in the other , they were told that they might have to perform grammatical judgments on some of the sentences at random, before then answering comprehension questions. The rationale of differentiating between the tasks was to manipulate reading goals . Results showed that participants responded incorrectly more often to the garden-path sentences than when not in the garden-path conditions . This indicated that L2 learners were quite likely to arrive at a final interpretation while lacking full syntactic analysis when reading garden-path sentences, which is consistent with previous studies. More importantly, reading tasks yielded different patterns of sentence comprehension. Specifically, the accuracy of comprehension was higher when the reading goal was to randomly make grammatical judgments on parts of the sentence than when the goal was solely to answer comprehension questions. Results were discussed in terms of ‘good-enough (GE)’ representations in L2 language comprehension.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구 방법
4. 연구 결과
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-701-001845676