메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
주도경 (서울대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제67집
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
171 - 185 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
UNESCO intangible cultural heritage convention has a certain influence to Chinese national government and regional government of Chinese Korean ethnic (Chaoxianzu) of the domains of intangible cultural heritage definition, the value of community participation and emphasis on living heritage. Chinese intangible cultural heritage law, however, shows a strong nationalism and sets ‘masterpiece’, which is the main value of world heritage rather than intangible cultural heritage, as a main criteria. The regulation of Yanbian Chaoxianzu prefecture does not put emphasis on national identity compared to national law, and gives more focus on transmitting person, but promotes branding by allotting singular heritage for each villages, which is against the value of cultural diversity. Under the circumstance of the vanishing community people, the importance of person in heritage is advocated by government and academia, but the actual participation of community people cannot be expected. The community is also facing the dilemma that for the protection of cultural heritage, commercialization is inevitable. Upon the urgency of registration of cultural heritage and the need for commercialization, the matter of authenticity is considered flexible. It partly reflects the nature of Chaoxianzu community which has no archetype to refer to, and also demonstrates the chance for revealing regional creativity. Turning to Korean case, intangible cultural property law still sticks to tradition and history, and follows standardized prototype. Considering the fact intangible cultural heritage puts importance on cultural diversity and community participation rather than outstanding universal value, regional creativity presented by Chaoxianzu intangible cultural heritage has implication to the Korean intangible cultural property policy.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론: 유네스코 무형문화유산 제도와 관련 쟁점들
Ⅱ. 유네스코와 국가
Ⅲ. 유네스코-국가-지방정부
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-910-001859319