지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제32호
- 발행연도
- 2021.2
- 수록면
- 25 - 57 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.46329/LLF.2021.2.32.25
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As a way to protect platform labor, the so-called "grey zone" claim is being reemerged around the world. According to it, the new platform labor is different from traditional workers in many ways, and is in the middle of an area that cannot be protected by conventional labor laws, so a new rule to make a third position needs to be legislated to protect them. The discussion begins with the premise that platform workers are in a blind spot where they are difficult to easily be recognized for reasons such as their employment type and work style and that they receive no legal protection under a dichotomous classification system. Thus, creating a trade-off that can protect them customarily and providing protection that is, if not in part, similar to the labor law may seems to be a development of the right to improve over the present state. Creating a third category of worker status, however, is a key to excluding platform workers from the application of labor laws.
Currently, the areas that are mainly problematic with platform labor in Korea are those who carry out food delivery and transportation services, which are considered highly worker-like from various angles. In order to protect them first, they should not take the unknown concerns of other areas of platform labor that have yet to emerge, bypassing labor laws and retreating to a third status in advance, but rather, we should approach them more actively from the perspective of labor law. To this end, it is necessary not to create a new right to protect the special status of "platform workers," but to confirm the universal right that everyone working deserves. In particular, it should be preceded by a fundamental restructuring of the way in which platform companies judge worker performance based on the tangible signs derived from traditional worker concepts, as simple modifications to the business model can easily escape liability. It is desirable to actively introduce the use of worker classification test such as AB5 in California to apply labor laws not only for platform labor but also for dependent self-employed businesses as a whole.
Currently, the areas that are mainly problematic with platform labor in Korea are those who carry out food delivery and transportation services, which are considered highly worker-like from various angles. In order to protect them first, they should not take the unknown concerns of other areas of platform labor that have yet to emerge, bypassing labor laws and retreating to a third status in advance, but rather, we should approach them more actively from the perspective of labor law. To this end, it is necessary not to create a new right to protect the special status of "platform workers," but to confirm the universal right that everyone working deserves. In particular, it should be preceded by a fundamental restructuring of the way in which platform companies judge worker performance based on the tangible signs derived from traditional worker concepts, as simple modifications to the business model can easily escape liability. It is desirable to actively introduce the use of worker classification test such as AB5 in California to apply labor laws not only for platform labor but also for dependent self-employed businesses as a whole.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 미국의 플랫폼 노동 - 현황과 쟁점
Ⅲ. 입법적 해결 시도
Ⅳ. 시사점 ― 한국의 플랫폼 노동 입법 논의
Ⅴ. 더 나아가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
디지털 전환시대 플랫폼 노동자의 법적 보호방안
법학연구
2021 .06
-
플랫폼 노동자의 근로권에 관한 헌법적 검토
헌법학연구
2024 .09
-
플랫폼노동의 쟁점과 향후 입법 · 정책적 과제
노동법포럼
2020 .02
-
지금 왜 다시 사용자인가?: 플랫폼 노동관계에서 사용자 찾기
노동법포럼
2020 .11
-
플랫폼 노동자의 근로자성
노동법포럼
2021 .02
-
우리나라의 플랫폼노동에 관한 논의
동아법학
2023 .02
-
플랫폼노동 종사자의 노동법적 쟁점과 보호방안
아주법학
2020 .01
-
플랫폼노동 조직화 모델 제안: 플랫폼노동과 그림자노동 관점의 통합
경영학연구
2023 .02
-
한국에서의 플랫폼노동에 대한 법제화 논의 현황과 쟁점
강원법학
2021 .02
-
플랫폼과 가사노동자 : 노동법적 보호를 중심으로
이화젠더법학
2019 .12
-
플랫폼 노동과 사회계약의 재구성
시민과세계
2022 .06
-
계약노동 종사자간 공동행위에 대한 공정거래법과 노동조합법의 중첩적 적용 문제
경쟁법연구
2023 .04
-
플랫폼 노동 입법 논의의 성과와 과제
산업관계연구
2022 .12
-
고용환경의 변화, 노동법의 위기와 대응 : 노동보호법의 인적 적용범위를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .09
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
감정노동에 대한 노동법적 규율방안
노동법논총
2015 .12
-
플랫폼 노무제공자에 관한 논의와 쟁점
일감법학
2022 .12
-
보험설계사의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제
노동법논총
2019 .12
-
노동조합법상 근로자 개념 확대와 그 후속문제에 대한 단상
노동법학
2019 .12
-
디지털 플랫폼노동 확산과 위험성에 대한 비판적 검토
경제와사회
2020 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0