메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김윤정 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
다빈치미래교양연구소 교양학연구 교양학연구 제14집
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
141 - 173 (33page)
DOI
10.24173/jge.2021.01.14.6

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to comprehensively examine the practical aspects of credibility as well as the academic and theoretical characteristics of credibility through a survey of the perceptions of university students on credibility. In addition, while analyzing the social atmosphere and context reflected in the perception of credibility, it attempts to derive implications for the direction of communication education in university liberal arts education.
In this study, the constituent elements of credibility that college students think are classified into affective, cognitive, behavioral, integrated, and social categories according to their characteristics, and after presenting each detailed element, the characteristics of the characters mentioned in each example were examined.
Looking at people with credibility by field, entertainers(20.4%) > lecturers(11.7%) > administrators(9.7%) > writers(7.8%) > YouTubers(6.8%), politicians(6.8%), professionals(6.8%) > Businessmen(4.9%) followed by facilitators(3.9%), professors and researchers(3.9%), athletes(1.9%), and religious people(1.9%).
This paper categorizes the constituent elements of public confidence through the analysis of university students" perceptions of the public confidence of the speaker, and presents the constituent elements, and suggests an educational plan based on the hierarchy and diffusion between each category.
This study is meaningful in that it can be used in the development of liberal arts education contents to increase communication competency according to changing times as a basic data for communication education for university students in the future.

목차

1. 서론
2. 선행연구 및 이론적 배경
3. 연구 대상 및 연구 절차
4. 연구 결과 분석
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-005-001464865