지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제118호
- 발행연도
- 2020.12
- 수록면
- 249 - 288 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.12.118.249
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article are claims and arguments made over the Joseon Central Council for Social Organizations issue and the controversy that ensued over its nature. The objective of such examination is to compare the contents of the argument that surfaced in colonized Joseon for a Unified Socialist Popular Political Party, with how Socialist movements actually progressed in another country, which was in this case Japan.
From 1924 through 1927, after it was confirmed that a General Election would be held in Japan, suggestions and propositions for a course correction in Socialist movements and political struggles for that aim began to spread both in Korea and Japan. In the wake of such arguments flying around, some of the Seoul-based Korean Socialists and some independent Socialists as well attempted to form the Joseon Central Council for Social Organizations (JCCSO).
Socialists who supported not only the formation of the council but also its permanent operations also argued that a supreme body (other than JCCSO) that could regulate all popular social bodies in Joseon should be established to represent the Proletariat Class. They envisioned it as either a council of a Unified Coalition of the Proletariat Class, or a lawful, Unified Proletariat Class Party, which could be described as a Unified Socialist Popular Political Party. The aforementioned Joseon Central Council for Social Organizations was considered as a medium that could facilitate the fruition of that unified, lawful Proletariat Class Party.
They did not deny the necessity of the Communist Party, but they still viewed it as a party only representing certain parts –albeit important parts- of the entire Proletariat Class. Unlike them, the Joseon Communist Party as well as other activists who were strongly against the idea of establishing a permanent body (apart from the Communist Party) argued that the Communist Party was in full representation of the entire Proletariat Class, and it stands for the independence of the Labor Class and the Proletariat Hegemony.
The supporters of the idea of JCCSO’s permanent establishment show us that there were indeed Socialists in Joseon with opinions different from those who were in favor of the ways of COMINTERN and the Communist Party, which strongly believed that only a Vanguard Party could and should lead the Revolutionary movement.
From 1924 through 1927, after it was confirmed that a General Election would be held in Japan, suggestions and propositions for a course correction in Socialist movements and political struggles for that aim began to spread both in Korea and Japan. In the wake of such arguments flying around, some of the Seoul-based Korean Socialists and some independent Socialists as well attempted to form the Joseon Central Council for Social Organizations (JCCSO).
Socialists who supported not only the formation of the council but also its permanent operations also argued that a supreme body (other than JCCSO) that could regulate all popular social bodies in Joseon should be established to represent the Proletariat Class. They envisioned it as either a council of a Unified Coalition of the Proletariat Class, or a lawful, Unified Proletariat Class Party, which could be described as a Unified Socialist Popular Political Party. The aforementioned Joseon Central Council for Social Organizations was considered as a medium that could facilitate the fruition of that unified, lawful Proletariat Class Party.
They did not deny the necessity of the Communist Party, but they still viewed it as a party only representing certain parts –albeit important parts- of the entire Proletariat Class. Unlike them, the Joseon Communist Party as well as other activists who were strongly against the idea of establishing a permanent body (apart from the Communist Party) argued that the Communist Party was in full representation of the entire Proletariat Class, and it stands for the independence of the Labor Class and the Proletariat Hegemony.
The supporters of the idea of JCCSO’s permanent establishment show us that there were indeed Socialists in Joseon with opinions different from those who were in favor of the ways of COMINTERN and the Communist Party, which strongly believed that only a Vanguard Party could and should lead the Revolutionary movement.
목차
머리말
1. 조선사회단체중앙협의회의 결성 제기와 일본 무산정당의 결성
2. 조선사회단체중앙협의회의 결성을 둘러싼 논란, 관련자들
3. 일본 무산정당의 분열과 상설론자들의 주장
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선사회단체중앙협의회 상설 · 비상설 논쟁
역사비평
2019 .08
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
1920년대 중반 순천무산자동맹회의 결성과 활동
역사학연구
2024 .08
-
새로운 주체와 민주주의의 토대로서 마르크스의 계급과 칸트의 물자체
시대와 철학
2020 .01
-
윌리엄 카를로스 윌리엄즈—문화전선과 현대시
영어영문학21
2016 .01
-
이원우 동시「세 발 달린 황소」연구 - 정수민 동화「세 발 달린 황소」와의 비교
아동청소년문학연구
2024 .06
-
초기 한인 사회주의 세력과 1921년 동방노력자공산대학 입학생
한국사학보
2025 .02
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
1920년대 開闢社의 조선지식 수집과 조선연구 토대 구축 - ‘조선문화 기본조사’의 추진과정과 내용 분석을 중심으로
역사연구
2019 .06
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
학문의 사명에 대한 마르크스주의 지식인의 두 가지 생각 : 8·15해방 직후 학술문화운동론을 중심으로
역사연구
2021 .01
-
‘무산정당(無産政黨) 의회 진출 운동’으로 본 1920년대 일본지역 조선인 사회주의자들의 정치운동과 그 특징 및 한계
한국독립운동사연구
2022 .02
-
1910~20년대 식민지 조선에서 개최된 공진회와 박람회의 성격
전북사학
2018 .01
-
일제의 통계 조사와 조선인의 비판적 해석
사림
2015 .01
-
도쿄지역 재일조선인의 3·1운동 기념일 투쟁의 양상과 특징 : 1920년대~1940년대
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .08
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
신간회의 창립 과정 연구 -조선공산당의 활동을 중심으로-
민족문화연구
2017 .01
-
일제강점기 盧明愚의 민족운동과 사회운동
대구사학
2021 .01
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
자크 랑시에르의 『프롤레타리아의 밤』에 대한 서평
인문학연구
2021 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0