메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Antonio Carlos Rocha de Sousa (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)
저널정보
한국라틴아메리카학회 라틴아메리카연구 라틴아메리카연구 Vol.33 No.3
발행연도
2020.10
수록면
115 - 133 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper we discuss the hypothesis which centers on the interpretation of Gilberto Freyre’s democratic ideas, proposed by Arthur Ramos and Roger Bastide, which led to the emergence of the myth of “racial democracy.” The basis of the interpretation is the author’s concept of “social democracy,” found in his writings of the mid-1930s; however, this concept is not found in his essay that Casa Grande & Senzala published in 1933, although many claim to find it there. Due to its importance, the book was translated into English as The Masters and Slaves, and published in 1946. We try to demonstrate that the origin of the myth of racial democracy cannot be found in the book, not even as an implicit idea; however, it originated from the interpretation by its critics. Therefore, in this paper we show that Gilberto Freyre proposed a balance of opposites, in a negotiated relationship that was not peaceful, but violent; however, in a relationship which Freyre conceptualized as a “balance of antagonisms” rather than as the “racial democracy,” which was interpreted by his critics.

목차

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
BALANCE OF ANTAGONISMS
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0