지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 1 - 136 (136page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The housing policy of the Seoul Metropolitan Government focused on expanding the supply of new homes during the period of high growth. As a result, it preferred demolition and redevelopment to repairs and improvements for the purpose of increasing the housing stock in Seoul. However, the potential economic growth is slowing down today, and it is expected that the number of households is going to decrease after the mid-2030s, as is the population. Around 3.9% of total housing stock in Seoul consists of ageing stock whose administrative durability periods exceed their economic durability periods. If there is no supply of new homes in the future, this proportion will likely increase up to 5.7% in five years and up to 11.4% in 10 years. In the era of low growth, it is important that housing stock be reserved and managed properly, not only by providing newly-built houses, but also by promoting the quality of used houses.
In order to increase the durability of existing houses and promote voluntary improvements and renovations by homeowners, the housing stock management policy of Seoul city needs to follow three principles. First, the administrative durability periods of buildings should be gradually set to be equal to the economic durability periods. Second, the goal of housing stock management should be set up as the achievement of long-lasting buildings with a focus on health, safety, and habitability (incl. barrier-free design and energy efficiency). Third, the response and management for ageing stock should maintain a balance between point- and area-based approaches.
This research provides three new directions for achieving the goal of housing stock management. First, housing improvement and renovation assistance programs need to be improved. It is necessary to modify the requirements for housing improvement assistance and to make an upward adjustment of the administrative durability period. With this policy goal taken into account, programs should establish their targets properly, as well as the types and contents of improvement work. In addition, incentives for housing improvement need to be complimented by the introduction of tax-cuts and an increased limit of the amount of improvement work assistance. In the long run, it is desirable that Seoul city operates the investigation and assessment system used to evaluate the qualities and performances of houses.
Second, a systematic organisation and operation system is needed to establish a better housing improvement system. It is recommended that two divisions in the Seoul Metropolitan Government, that is, the Housing Policy Division and the Residential Environment Improvement Division, cooperate with each other to establish housing improvement governance of local communities. A quality certification system for housing improvement companies would help build public confidence in their works. In the long term, it would be extremely useful to set up a housing inventory management system that manages a database containing all relevant data and information such as construction, improvement, maintenance, etc.
Third, transactions of used houses need to be promoted by modifying relevant institutions. It is necessary to upgrade the current certification standard, such as by establishing long-lasting building conditions, and it ought to be ensured that a new standard can be met through housing improvements and renovations. The public assistance that can be provided in housing transactions should be reinforced to create a situation where improvements or renovations can be carried out when transactions involving used houses occur.
In order to increase the durability of existing houses and promote voluntary improvements and renovations by homeowners, the housing stock management policy of Seoul city needs to follow three principles. First, the administrative durability periods of buildings should be gradually set to be equal to the economic durability periods. Second, the goal of housing stock management should be set up as the achievement of long-lasting buildings with a focus on health, safety, and habitability (incl. barrier-free design and energy efficiency). Third, the response and management for ageing stock should maintain a balance between point- and area-based approaches.
This research provides three new directions for achieving the goal of housing stock management. First, housing improvement and renovation assistance programs need to be improved. It is necessary to modify the requirements for housing improvement assistance and to make an upward adjustment of the administrative durability period. With this policy goal taken into account, programs should establish their targets properly, as well as the types and contents of improvement work. In addition, incentives for housing improvement need to be complimented by the introduction of tax-cuts and an increased limit of the amount of improvement work assistance. In the long run, it is desirable that Seoul city operates the investigation and assessment system used to evaluate the qualities and performances of houses.
Second, a systematic organisation and operation system is needed to establish a better housing improvement system. It is recommended that two divisions in the Seoul Metropolitan Government, that is, the Housing Policy Division and the Residential Environment Improvement Division, cooperate with each other to establish housing improvement governance of local communities. A quality certification system for housing improvement companies would help build public confidence in their works. In the long term, it would be extremely useful to set up a housing inventory management system that manages a database containing all relevant data and information such as construction, improvement, maintenance, etc.
Third, transactions of used houses need to be promoted by modifying relevant institutions. It is necessary to upgrade the current certification standard, such as by establishing long-lasting building conditions, and it ought to be ensured that a new standard can be met through housing improvements and renovations. The public assistance that can be provided in housing transactions should be reinforced to create a situation where improvements or renovations can be carried out when transactions involving used houses occur.
목차
[표지]
[요약]
주택의 신규공급·재고관리 균형있게 추진하는 정책으로 전환이 필요
저출산·고령화·저성장시대 재고관리 정책목표는 주택 장수명화·성능향상
경제적 내용연수 초과한 서울의 노후주택 비율은 호수 기준으로 3.9%
서울의 주택재고 관리정책·지원프로그램은 종합적·체계적이지 못한 실정
선진국은 시장가치 있는 양질의 주택재고 늘리는 정책 종합적으로 추진
주택소유자의 자발적 주택개량·리모델링 활성화 지원하는 정책이 필수적
주택개량·리모델링 제도, 현실적 수요 반영해 지원기준·절차 개선할 필요
주택개량 관련 조직·운영 체계화하고, 주택이력정보 시스템 구축 바람직
장수명주택 인증제도 개선 등 중고주택 거래 활성화 위한 지원책 세워야
[목차]
표 목차
그림 목차
[01 연구개요]
1_ 연구배경 및 목적
2_ 연구내용 및 방법
[02 주택재고 관리의 의의와 목표]
1_ 주택재고 관리의 의의
2_ 주택재고 관리의 목표
[03 주거상황과 주택재고 관리정책]
1_ 사회경제적 여건 변화와 서울의 주택재고
2_ 서울시민의 주거상황 및 수준
3_ 주택재고 관리정책의 현황과 문제점
[04 주요 선진국의 주택재고 관리정책]
1_ 영국의 주택적응·개량 지원정책
2_ 일본의 주택개량 및 리모델링 지원제도
[05 주택재고 관리정책의 방향]
1_ 재고관리정책의 목표와 방향
2_ 주택재고 관리정책의 과제와 프로그램
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지역 주거특성에 따른 주거환경 만족도에 관한 연구 : 경남지역을 중심으로
주거환경
2017 .06
-
주거서비스 관계법령 운영 현황 분석 및 문제점 도출 연구
주거환경
2024 .12
-
서울시 주택시장의 변화특성과 정책과제
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .09
-
1인 가구 특성이 주거 선호속성과 주거 만족도에 미치는 영향 - 주거정책을 통한 집단의 매개된 조절 효과를 중심으로 -
주거환경
2019 .12
-
주거기본법의 제정과 주거권, 그 함의
공법연구
2016 .06
-
Theoretical Reflections on Housing Policy and Housing Markets in South Korea: Focusing on the 1960s to 1990s
한국도시지리학회지
2024 .08
-
서울시 주거지원 프로그램 수요의 잠재계층별 특성 분석
주거환경
2024 .12
-
주택정책이 주택가격에 미치는 영향
감정평가학논집
2021 .08
-
Housing Preferences in the Pandemic Era
부동산법학
2021 .12
-
저소득층의 주거 안정성 향상을 위한 공공임대주택 정책의 효과 분석
도시디자인저널
2024 .06
-
정부의 주택정책과 시장특성이 주택구매의향에 미치는 영향 연구 - 서울시를 중심으로 -
주거환경
2020 .09
-
강원도 아동주거빈곤가구의 유형별 주거만족도 분석
주거환경
2021 .12
-
서울시의 공공임대주택정책 목표와 발전 방향
주택도시연구
2019 .04
-
청년들은 왜 쉐어하우스를 선호하지 않을까? - 청년들의 주거 가치관을 통한 공유주거 의향 저하의 영향요인 탐색 -
주거환경
2025 .03
-
공업화주택의 규제에 관한 연구
행정법연구
2019 .08
-
청년주거위기 극복을 위한 주거소비지표 도출 및 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Analysis) 분석을 통한 기존세대와의 비교 연구
Crisisonomy
2022 .01
-
The Public Housing and Residential Differentiations : Case Study of Wuhan City
도시행정학보
2015 .09
-
시공지원형 주택개량 프로그램 개선방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2023 .03
-
공공임대주택의 주거비용 감소와 주거안정에 미치는 영향 분석
부동산정책연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0