지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 103 - 117 (15page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to examine European reactions against the Ottoman mission headed by Enver Pasha, who was dispatched to China during the ‘Boxer Uprising’ in 1901. Based on Western archival documents, we can find reliable and informative correspondence about the attitude of the European countries toward the sultan’s mission and its pan-Islamic plans in China. The coming of the Ottoman mission caused great reaction in such European countries as Britain, France, Germany and Russia, who were engaged in a competitive power struggle for an influential political and economic position in China. They kept a close watch on the sultan’s envoy to find out his secret mission on the one hand and tried to persuade Enver Pasha not to work against their advantage in China on the other.
From time to time, Abdul Hamid II (r. 1876-1909), the sultan of the Ottoman Empire, sent China an official mission and secret agents, through whom he tried to subjugate Chinese Muslims for his own advantage1. The significance for the Ottoman Empire of any success in penetrating China by way of a pan-Islamic approach cannot be overrated, not only for political advantage but also for commercial and cultural benefit. Like other European countries, Ottomans could retain or gain rights which might bring them opportunities for free trade in opium and in other commodities.2
The sultan believed that they would constitute a great political factor to his advantage, because most of the tens of millions of Chinese Muslims recognized the Ottoman sultan as their caliph and praised him in their Friday sermon (Khutuba).3 Taking these factors into consideration, he decided to dispatch the Enver Pasha mission during the Boxer Uprising (1898-1901),4 responding to the suggestion of German Kaiser Wilhelm II. However, when the Ottoman mission arrived in China, the uprising had already been suppressed. This unexpected situation made the envoy initiate meaningful contacts with Chinese Muslims during its stay in China.
From time to time, Abdul Hamid II (r. 1876-1909), the sultan of the Ottoman Empire, sent China an official mission and secret agents, through whom he tried to subjugate Chinese Muslims for his own advantage1. The significance for the Ottoman Empire of any success in penetrating China by way of a pan-Islamic approach cannot be overrated, not only for political advantage but also for commercial and cultural benefit. Like other European countries, Ottomans could retain or gain rights which might bring them opportunities for free trade in opium and in other commodities.2
The sultan believed that they would constitute a great political factor to his advantage, because most of the tens of millions of Chinese Muslims recognized the Ottoman sultan as their caliph and praised him in their Friday sermon (Khutuba).3 Taking these factors into consideration, he decided to dispatch the Enver Pasha mission during the Boxer Uprising (1898-1901),4 responding to the suggestion of German Kaiser Wilhelm II. However, when the Ottoman mission arrived in China, the uprising had already been suppressed. This unexpected situation made the envoy initiate meaningful contacts with Chinese Muslims during its stay in China.
목차
THE BACKGROUND OF THE BOXER UPRISING AND DISPATCH OF THE OTTOMAN ENVOY
THE MISSION’S ACTIVITIES IN CHINA
EUROPEAN REACTIONS AGAINST THE OTTOMAN MISSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
오월항쟁과 여성의 증언― ‘밥’과 ‘총’의 서사를 중심으로 ―
호남학
2021 .12
-
China’s engagement with Kazakhstan and Russia’s Zugzwang: Why is Nur-Sultan incurring regional power hedging?
Journal of Eurasian Studies
2020 .01
-
5･18항쟁의 명칭문제 : ‘광주’와 ‘민중’이라는 용어를 중심으로
민주주의와 인권
2015 .12
-
The Muslims in Hong Kong and their Religious Symbols
한국이슬람학회 논총
2015 .01
-
10월 부마항쟁의 진실과 역사적 성찰: 10·16 부산항쟁과 10·18 마산항쟁의 비교분석
한국과 국제사회
2018 .01
-
Islamic Pre-Revival in China with the Impact from Egypt_ Case Study of Ma Jian and his works
Mediterranean review
2022 .12
-
Religion and Banking : A Study of Islamic Finance in India
산경연구논집
2018 .06
-
5･18민주화운동 유가족 1세대 및 2세대의 집단트라우마
민주주의와 인권
2021 .09
-
조선통신사 여정의 해양인문학적 고찰 : 1636년 사행의 해로를 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2016 .12
-
교과서 속의 5·18 광주민중항쟁 : 2014년 개정 교과서를 중심으로
민주주의와 인권
2018 .06
-
ISIS이후 아랍세계의 변화와 이슬람포비아 (Islamophobia) 현상에 대한 고찰
한국이슬람학회 논총
2019 .01
-
5 · 18연구소 20년과 5 · 18 연구 : 연구 성과에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로
민주주의와 인권
2016 .12
-
임무형지휘 개념의 심리학적 이론 기반에 대한 고찰
한국군사학논총
2019 .01
-
5･18민주화운동 일선 대응인의 피해와 트라우마: 수습위원, 의사, 간호사, 시신 수습인을 중심으로
민주주의와 인권
2021 .09
-
실질과세원칙에 입각한 이슬람 금융의 과세방법
조세학술논집
2016 .02
-
The Development of Islamic Banking and Financial Institution in United Kingdom
Asian Journal of Business Environment
2018 .04
-
한국 관광에 대한 심리적 거리 연구: 무슬림을 대상으로
서비스경영학회지
2017 .12
-
재지사족의 체제이반과 1862년 진주민란
한국동양정치사상사연구
2017 .03
-
오스만제국의 다문화 통치 전략으로써의 비무슬림 복식 규정과 예루살렘 유대인 복식
한국중동학회논총
2022 .10
-
이슬람법과 젠더(Gender)에 관한 연구 - 혼인과 이혼을 중심으로-
지중해지역연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-916-001529689