메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법철학회 법철학연구 법철학연구 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
329 - 360 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Habermas`s theory of communicative action fundamentally rests on two concepts of rationality and the two-level perspective of lifeworld and system. According to Habermas, the economic and political systems are formally organized domains of action that are no longer integrated through the mechanism of mutual understanding, that sheer off from lifeworld contexts into a kind of norm-free sociality; and the lifeworld has a twofold meaning: on the one hand, the horizon-forming contexts of culture, society and personality within which communitive action takes place, and on the other hand, the resources of possibilities from which participants in communicative action can transmit and renew cultural knowledge, establish solidarity and build social identity. Habermas assigns two important roles to law from the perspectives of the theory of communicative action. For Habermas, the first important role of law is to institutionalize the independence of economy and state from lifeworld structures; and the second important role of law concerns the thesis of the internal colonization of the lifeworld. Habermas claims that the present form of juridification in welfare states is markedly ambivalent. I would like to close by proposing that the legitimacy of law is on the basis of the communicative rationality, that normative claims of the lifeworld should be accepted in laws, and that the lifeworld dimentions of law should be analyzed from the perspective of communicative action aimed at mutual understanding.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-001264601