Comparative Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index Scoring Systems (1-4) Used in Differential Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses

Ozbay, Pelin Ozun; Ekinci, Tekin; Caltekin, Melike Demir; Yilmaz, Hasan Taylan; Temur, Muzaffer; Yilmaz, Ozgur; Uysal, Selda; Demirel, Emine; Kelekci, Sefa

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Ozbay, Pelin Ozun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aydin Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital) Ekinci, Tekin (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malatya State Hospital) Caltekin, Melike Demir (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malatya State Hospital) Yilmaz, Hasan Taylan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Onkomer Oncology and Medical Center, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital) Temur, Muzaffer (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manisa Merkezefendi State Hospital) Yilmaz, Ozgur (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manisa Merkezefendi State Hospital) Uysal, Selda (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manisa Merkezefendi State Hospital) Demirel, Emine (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital) Kelekci, Sefa (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital)

저널정보: 아시아태평양암예방학회 Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP 제16권 제1호

발행연도: 2015.1

수록면: 345 - 349 (5page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Background: To determine the cut-off values of the preoperative risk of malignancy index (RMI) used in differentiating benign or malignant adnexal masses and to determine their significance in differential diagnosis by comparison of different systems. Materials and Methods: 191 operated women were assessed retrospectively. RMI of 1, 2, 3 and 4; cut-off values for an effective benign or malignant differentiation together with sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Results: Cut-off value for RMI 1 was found to be 250; there was significant (p<0.001) compatibility at this level with sensitivity of 60%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 75%, specificity of 93%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% and an overall compliance rate of 85%. When RMI 2 and 3 was obtained with a cut-off value of 200, there was significant (p<0.001) compatibility at this level for RMI 2 with sensitivity of 67%, PPV of 67%, specificity of 89%, NPV of 89%, histopathologic correlation of 84% while RMI 3 had significant (p<0.001) compatibility at the same level with sensitivity of 63%, PPV of 69%, specificity of 91%, NPV of 88% and a histopathologic correlation of 84%. Significant (p<0.001) compatibility for RMI 4 with a sensitivity of 67%, PPV of 73%, specificity of 92%, NPV of 89% and a histopathologic correlation of 86% was obtained at the cut-off level 400. Conclusions: RMI have a significant predictability in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses, thus can effectively be used in clinical practice.

#Risk of malignancy index #adnexal mass #differential diagnosis

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!