메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Lee, Byung Min (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Chang, Jee Suk (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Cho, Young Up (Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Park, Seho (Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Park, Hyung Seok (Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Kim, Jee Ye (Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Sohn, Joo Hyuk (Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Kim, Gun Min (Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Koo, Ja Seung (Department of Pathology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Keum, Ki Chang (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Suh, Chang-Ok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Kim, Yong Bae
저널정보
대한방사선종양학회 Radiation oncology journal : ROJ Radiation oncology journal : ROJ 제36권 제2호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
139 - 146 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. Materials and Methods: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from 1992 to 2012 at our institution, where wide surgical excision is been routinely performed. Discrimination and calibration were used for assessing model performance. Patients with predicted 10-year IBTR risk based on an IBTR! 2.0 nomogram score of <3%, 3%-5%, 5%-10%, and >10% were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. We also plotted calibration values to observe the actual IBTR rate against the nomogram-derived 10-year IBTR probabilities. Results: The median follow-up period was 73 months (range, 6 to 277 months). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.607, showing poor accordance between the estimated and observed recurrence rate. Calibration plot confirmed that the IBTR! 2.0 nomogram predicted the 10-year IBTR risk higher than the observed IBTR rates in all groups. High discrepancies between nomogram IBTR predictions and observed IBTR rates were observed in overall risk groups. Compared with the original development dataset, our patients had fewer high grade tumors, less margin positivity, and less lymphovascular invasion, and more use of modern systemic therapies. Conclusions: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram seems to have the moderate discriminative ability with a tendency to over-estimating risk rate. Continued efforts are needed to ensure external applicability of published nomograms by validating the program using an external patient population.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0