메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject
Humanities
General Humanities History Philosophy Religious Studies Linguistics and Literature Other Humanities
Social science
General Social Science Business Management Tourism Education Military Science Library and Information Science Law Sociology Journalism and Media Studies Psychological Science Political Science and Diplomacy Geography Public Administration Economics International Trade Anthropology Other Social Science
Natural science
General Natural Science Physics Biology Life Sciences Mathematics/Statistics Astronomy Earth Science Chemistry Other Natural Science
Engineering
General Engineering Architectural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Material/Energy Engineering Electrical and Electronic Engineering Marine and Ocean Engineering Chemical Engineering Computer Science Other Engineering
Medical science
General Medical Science Nursing Science Veterinary Pharmacy Traditional Korean Medicine Basic Medicine Clinical Medicine Other Medicine
Agriculture and Fishery
General Agriculture and Fishery Agriculture Fishery Science Food Science Forestry Animal Husbandry Marine Transportation Studies Other Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
General Arts Design Fine Arts Cosmetology Photography Music Fashion Kinesiology Performing Media Arts Other Arts and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Science and Technology Studies Brain and Cognitive Science Technology Policy Other Interdisciplinary Studies

KOR

Analysis Characteristics of Social Value Measurement Methods and the Latest Trends
Recommendations
Search
Questions

사회적 가치 측정방법의 특징 분석 및 최신 동향

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
A-reum Jung (사회적가치연구원) Seung Jun Hur (사회적가치연구원) Ki-kwang Song (사회적가치연구원) Bo Young Kim (사회적가치연구원)
Journal
Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration Korea Business Review Vol.24 No.3 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2020.8
Pages
145 - 171 (27page)
DOI
10.17287/kbr.2020.24.3.145

Usage

DBpia Top 5%Percentile based on 2-year
usage in the same subject category.
cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Analysis Characteristics of Social Value Measurement Methods and the Latest Trends
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
As the importance of social value has increased worldwide, various methods of social value measurement have been developed by many agents. In this respect, this study examines the trends regarding the development of social value measurement methods, the methodological differences between agents, and the characteristics of the latest measurement methods.
The development process of social value measurement method began with agents such as governments, international organizations, and non-profit foundations. As various agents develop and implement their own measurement methods, the call for global standardization has increased. The agents can be primarily categorized into international organizations, governments, nonprofit entities, impact investment institutions, consulting firms, and corporate initiatives. The measurement methods differ from agent to agent as the objectives of each are different.
This study considers five characteristics regarding recent social value measurement. First, there is a gradual movement to translate social value in monetary terms to utilize both social and economic values in decision-making. Second, since the 2010s, the international community has emphasized the need for the establishment of global standards for social value measurement. Third, there has been a transition from supplier-oriented measurements to a system that measures the actual change for beneficiaries. Fourth, changes have been made to integrate both social and economic values in reporting rather than social value alone. Lastly, there have been an increase in attempts to collect information via artificial intelligence and machine learning for more accurate measurement.
This is the first research to organize various agents based on their social value measurement methods. It provides insight on the current direction and role of these methods through their characteristics.
#사회적 가치 #측정방법 #임팩트 측정 #측정 주체 #Social value #Measurement Method #Impact measurement #Measurement subject

Contents

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사회적 가치 측정 동향
Ⅲ. 사회적 가치 측정방법 및 측정 주체
Ⅳ. 최신 사회적가치 측정방법에 대한 특징
Ⅴ. 결론
REFERENCES
Abstract

References (47)

Add References
Addy, C. / 2019 / Calculating the Value of Impact Investing / Harvard Business Review 97(1):102~109 google schola Altinay, L. / 2016 / Social value creation through tourism enterprise / Tourism Management 54:404~417 google schola 조상미 / 2014 / 공유가치창출을 실천하는 사회적기업: 정책분석을 통한 경쟁력 제고 / Korea Business Review 18(4):241~265 dbpia 조영복 / 2012 / 사회적기업 성과측정 도구로서의 사회적투자수익률 방법(SROI)과 측정사례 / 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지 7(6):29~45 dbpia Cho, Y. B. / 2013 / Study on Development of Indicators for Measuring Social value of Social Enterprise google schola

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

사회적 가치와 사회적 책임과 차이 : 개념 및 측정방법의 관점에서
배성호 ,  신수진 한국경영학회 융합학술대회 2020 .08
사회적 가치 법제화와 “사회적 가치”의 정의와 측정의 문제
한상엽 한국사회학회 심포지움 논문집 2017 .11
A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Indicators to Improve Field Conformity of Social Value Index (SVI)
Kim ,  Ik-Tae ,  Lee and others 5 Social Enterprise Studies 2020 .08
An Analysis of Social Value Creation in Social Cooperatives : Focusing on organizational internal factors and local government capacity
Yoo ,  Doo Ho ,  Eom Social Economy & Policy Studies 2020 .08
Measuring Social Performance of Social Enterprises in Social Progress Credit(SPC): Conversion of Social Performance into Monetary Value
Rha ,  June-Young ,  Kim Social Enterprise Studies 2018 .09

Recently viewed articles

학회소식 및 회원동정
구혜진Korean Geosynthetics Society2016.07
 Study of postpositional word [to] in the Japanese conditional expression
Kim kyoung-hyeundefined2008
 구舊와 신新의 역동적 변화와 소통, 안동 오일장
조정현Korea Studies Adancement Center2015.12
 환경교육을 위한 교육과정개발에 관한 기초연구(RR-60)
김수일Korea Education Development Institute1977.01

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-324-001158242