메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
岡本 洋之 (日本 兵庫大學)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 동북아시아문화학회 2020년 제40차 춘계연합국제학술대회
발행연도
2020.7
수록면
189 - 192 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay shows that TSUCHIDA Kyôson (1891-1934), philosopher and leader of the movement of Free Colleges of General Education, 1920-30, constructed theories of education in a roundabout way. He was influenced by the book Proletcult written by Mr and Mrs Paul from England. But they were strongly against the general education for the labour class, to sharpen an attack on The Workers’ Educational Association (WEA), a famous institution of general education, condemning it as a class-struggle breaker. Tsuchida said that the theory of the Pauls was wrong, because they neglected lots of the legacies of human being, as Shakespeare’s works or ancient Greek arts. Blaming the Pauls, Tsuchida gradually made his theories, never investigating WEA, though he got much data of it. Tsuchida looks to have distrusted on it, for it decreased the tutorial classes of economic studies, so, from his viewpoint, WEA looked like Essa Summer College in Niigata Prefecture, a government agency established to raise supporters of the imperial state. The author thinks that Tsuchida’s neglect on WEA deprived him of getting the method of creating autodidact culture at Japanese Free Colleges of General Education. For this reason, the number of the audience decreased at the Free Colleges in the last half of the 1920s, and at last they faded out.

목차

1. ポール夫妻のプロレットカルト論を批判した土田
2. 労働者への教養教育を批判していたポール夫妻
3. 英国の労働者教養教育機関から直接に学ばなかった土田-仮説の提起を含めて-
〈引用·参考文献〉
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-910-001090627