메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ObjectiveAfter globally acceptance of planned vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), the mode of induction is still amatter of debate and requires further discussion. We aimed to study obstetric outcomes in post-cesarean patientsundergoing induction of labor with prostaglandin gel compared with patients who developed spontaneous laborpains. MethodsAll patients at 34 weeks or more of gestation with previous one cesarean section eligible for trial of labor aftercesarean section admitted in a labor room within one year were divided in 2 groups. Group one consisted of patientswho experienced the spontaneous onset of labor pains and group 2 consisted of patients who underwent inductionof labor with prostaglandin gel. They were analyzed for maternofetal outcomes. Descriptive statistics, independentsample t-test, and chi-square test were applied using SPSS 20 software for statistical analysis. ResultsBoth groups were comparable in maternal age, parity, and fetal weight, but different in bishop score, mode ofdelivery, and neonatal outcome. Admisson bishop score was 6.61±2.51 in group 1 and 3.15±1.27 in group 2 (P<0.005). In the patients who experienced spontaneous labor, 86.82% had successful VBAC. In the patients with induced labor,64.34% had successful VBAC with an average dose of gel of 1.65±0.75. Both groups had one case each of uterinerupture. The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was 4.1% in group one and 10.4% in group 2. ConclusionThis study reflects that supervised labor induction with prostaglandin gel in previous one cesarean section patients isa safe and effective option.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0