메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한산부인과학회 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 제62권 제6호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
404 - 410 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ObjectiveThe lack of obstetricians in Japan has prevented the implementation of a 24–hour delivery monitoring system forhigh-risk deliveries such as twin vaginal delivery at many obstetric facilities. To examine the outcomes of a 1-day trialof the vaginal delivery of twins at 36–37 weeks’ gestation. MethodsWe induced the vaginal delivery of twins at 36–37 weeks’ gestation of 256 women who provided consent betweenJanuary 2007 and December 2016 using the following protocol: 1) administration of 0.5 mg oral prostaglandin E2every 1 hour (maximum: 1.5 mg) in the morning; 2) intravenous administration of oxytocin and amniotomy in theafternoon; and 3) selection of caesarean delivery when vaginal delivery was not expected by evening. We examinedtheir perinatal outcomes in a chart review. ResultsThe completion rates of vaginal delivery in total, nulliparous, and multiparous women were 79%, 72%, and 84%,respectively. There were no cases of neonatal asphyxia. The total incidence of neonatal respiratory disorders was2.1%, but there were no cases of persistent pulmonary hypertension. The total incidence of postpartum hemorrhagerequiring transfusion was 2.7%. ConclusionThe 1-day planned vaginal delivery of twins at 36–37 weeks’ gestation appears valid and safe, and our findingssuggest that it can be an option for the delivery of twins.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0