지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Volume 13 Number 1 (Spring 2010)
- 발행연도
- 2010.3
- 수록면
- 11 - 36 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article observes how Newtonian science was interpreted by two intellectuals from Korea and Japan who encountered it for the first time in their respective countries. In their responses, Korea’s Choe Hangi and Japan’s Shizuki Tadao displayed both similarities and differences. First, they are similar because they interpreted Newtonian science using traditional East Asian gi theory. Universalism and materialism of gi functioned as a common intellectual basis for premodern intellectuals of East Asia.
Despite their common gi-based foundation, their thoughts on natural philosophy, as expressed through their interpretations of Newtonian science, display differences. Choe Hangi built a gi philosophy of his own using only gi theory. Devising a gi mechanism, Choe ultimately discarded Newtonian physics. In his gihak, the supranatural God was not recognized and all phenomena of nature were explained using only his mechanics of gi.
Shizuki Tadao also attempted to interpret Newtonian science by applying the theory of gi. He denied the concept of a vacuum, and sought to explain the source and mechanism of gravity through gi. He did not, however, exhaustively pursue the theory and philosophy of gi as did Choe Hangi. Accepting the perspective of Newtonian science, Shizuki Tadao recognized the origin of gravity as unknowable. Then, Shizuki could not deduce the standard of morals and ethics of the humanity from the principles of nature and had to acknowledge the supranatural God as the creator and ruler of nature.
The Newtonian science these two East Asian intellectuals understood was not the Newtonian science of the West. In premodern East Asia, Newtonian science was a context dependent knowledge, meaning its place was dependent upon specific historical and cultural contexts.
Despite their common gi-based foundation, their thoughts on natural philosophy, as expressed through their interpretations of Newtonian science, display differences. Choe Hangi built a gi philosophy of his own using only gi theory. Devising a gi mechanism, Choe ultimately discarded Newtonian physics. In his gihak, the supranatural God was not recognized and all phenomena of nature were explained using only his mechanics of gi.
Shizuki Tadao also attempted to interpret Newtonian science by applying the theory of gi. He denied the concept of a vacuum, and sought to explain the source and mechanism of gravity through gi. He did not, however, exhaustively pursue the theory and philosophy of gi as did Choe Hangi. Accepting the perspective of Newtonian science, Shizuki Tadao recognized the origin of gravity as unknowable. Then, Shizuki could not deduce the standard of morals and ethics of the humanity from the principles of nature and had to acknowledge the supranatural God as the creator and ruler of nature.
The Newtonian science these two East Asian intellectuals understood was not the Newtonian science of the West. In premodern East Asia, Newtonian science was a context dependent knowledge, meaning its place was dependent upon specific historical and cultural contexts.
목차
Introduction
Meeting Newtonian Science
Choe Hangi and Newtonian Science
Shizuki Tadao and Newtonian Science
Conclusion
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
최한기 기학 체계내의 과학 -혜강의 서학수용과 그 한계
대동문화연구
2004 .01
-
최한기의 기학과 서양 근대천문학
대동문화연구
2019 .01
-
고고학연구에 있어 GIS 활용
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2010 .01
-
최한기 氣學의 사상사적 의미와 위상
대동문화연구
2004 .01
-
중국-EU-미국 간 지리적 표시 보호제도에 대한 글로벌 분쟁 및 중국의 시사점
민족연구
2019 .01
-
崔漢綺의 運化氣學
대동문화연구
2004 .01
-
Science and Politics, Ethics of Scientist
윤리연구
2017 .01
-
중국 ‘과학구국’ 사상과 현대 과학 이념 발전 연구
중국학논총
2019 .01
-
혜강 최한기 氣學에 나타난 깨달음의 의미
동양철학
2014 .01
-
2000年을 향하는 科學ㆍ技術
동서문화
1973 .11
-
Science and Technology
Korea Journal
1986 .10
-
Landscape and Historicity of Korean Science of the Early to Middle Nineteenth Century
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .03
-
과학사의 응용: 차이를 이해하기
한국과학사학회지
2013 .01
-
성령론: 氣論的 전개 가능성
신학과세계
2004 .03
-
證驗學을 표방한 최한기 철학
태동고전연구
2017 .01
-
中国科学社对科学的认知
동아인문학
2003 .12
-
과학사에 있어서의 ‘근세’: 조선과 일본의 비교검토
한국과학사학회지
2003 .01
-
자연 탐구 중심의 과학 교육 프로그램에 관한 연구
인문학논총
2002 .02
-
1960년대 ‘과학기술 붐’: 한국의 현대적 과학기술체제의 형성
한국과학사학회지
2007 .01
-
최한기의 종교회통사상 - 『신기통』의 ‘통교(通敎)’개념을 중심으로 -
종교연구
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000958689